...
首页> 外文期刊>Public Health Ethics >Behavior Change or Empowerment: On the Ethics of Health-Promotion Strategies
【24h】

Behavior Change or Empowerment: On the Ethics of Health-Promotion Strategies

机译:行为改变或授权:关于健康促进策略的伦理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There are several strategies to promote health in individuals and populations. Two general approaches to health promotion are behavior change and empowerment. The aim of this article is to present those two kinds of strategies, and show that the behavior-change approach has some moral problems, problems that the empowerment approach (on the whole) is better at handling. Two distinct ‘ideal types’ of these practices are presented and scrutinized. Behavior change interventions use various kinds of theories to target people’s behavior, which they do through information, persuasion, coercion and manipulation. Empowerment is a collaborative method where those ‘facilitated’ participate in the change process. Some ethical problems with the behavior-change model are that it does not sufficiently respect the right to autonomy of the individuals involved and risks reducing their ability for autonomy, and that it risks increasing health inequalities. Empowerment, on the other hand, respects the participant’s right to autonomy, tends to increase the ability for autonomy, as well as increasing other coping skills, and is likely to reduce inequalities. A drawback with this approach is that it often takes longer to realize.
机译:有几种促进个人和人群健康的策略。促进健康的两种通用方法是行为改变和赋权。本文的目的是介绍这两种策略,并表明行为改变方法存在一些道德问题,即授权方法(整体上)更易于处理。介绍并仔细研究了两种不同的“理想类型”。行为改变干预措施使用各种理论来针对人们的行为,他们通过信息,说服,强迫和操纵来进行行为干预。赋权是一种协作方法,其中那些“协助者”参与了变更过程。行为改变模型的一些伦理问题是,它没有充分尊重所涉及个人的自治权,并有降低其自治能力的风险,并且有加剧健康不平等的风险。另一方面,赋权则尊重参与者的自主权,往往会增强自主能力,并增加其他应对技巧,并有可能减少不平等现象。这种方法的缺点是通常需要更长的时间才能实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号