首页> 外文期刊>Public Choice >Public employees lining up at the polls—the conditional effect of living and working in the same municipality
【24h】

Public employees lining up at the polls—the conditional effect of living and working in the same municipality

机译:公职人员在民意测验中排队-在同一城市生活和工作的条件影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Do public employees vote more frequently than private employees? The turnout of public employees has been of central interest to public choice scholars for almost a century. Utilizing a government records dataset that is not subject to over-reporting and differential social desirability bias, we find that public employees voted 11–12 percentage points more than their counterparts in the private sector. In a multivariate analysis, however, the effect is only four to five percentage points greater for local government public employees, which is in the lower range of previous studies. We are able to distinguish between local government and central government employees and show that the latter vote two percentage points less than the former. Controlling for the specific type of educational background does not explain the public–private turnout differential. Finally, the effect of working and voting in the same municipality is larger for local government employees than other citizens. This is in accordance with their greater incentives as they elect their future employer, though the effect size is surprisingly small.
机译:公职人员的投票频率是否比私人员工高?近一个世纪以来,公职人员的到来一直是公共选择学者的中心兴趣。利用不受过度报告和不同的社会期望偏差影响的政府记录数据集,我们发现公共雇员的投票率比私营部门的投票者高11-12个百分点。但是,在多变量分析中,对地方政府公职人员的影响仅大四到五个百分点,而这在以前的研究中是较低的。我们能够区分地方政府雇员和中央政府雇员,并表明后者的投票率比前者低两个百分点。对特定类型的教育背景进行控制并不能解释公私部门的投票率差异。最后,在同一市镇工作和投票对当地政府雇员的影响要大于其他公民。这是因为他们选出未来的雇主时会采取更大的激励措施,尽管效果很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号