首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Ideological extremism and electoral design. Multimember versus single member districts
【24h】

Ideological extremism and electoral design. Multimember versus single member districts

机译:意识形态极端主义和选举设计。多成员区与单成员区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Relying on a formal theoretical model, Gary Cox demonstrates that single member districts induce candidates toward policy positions at their constituency median while multimember districts encourage dispersion. We test this theoretical implication in the context of the Arizona state legislature, in which each legislative district chooses one senator and two representatives in single member and multimember contests respectively. To do so, we generate W-NOMINATE estimates of scores based on roll-call data from the Arizona state legislature that are comparable across chambers (Senate and House). Our results are substantially less supportive of the formal theory than are those of prior studies.
机译:依靠正式的理论模型,加里·考克斯(Gary Cox)证明,单成员区会诱使候选人以其选区中位数担任政策职位,而多成员区会鼓励分散。我们在亚利桑那州立法机构的环境中测试了这种理论含义,在该立法机构中,每个立法区在单成员和多成员竞争中分别选择一名参议员和两名代表。为此,我们根据亚利桑那州立法机关的点名数据生成W-NOMINATE分数估算值,这些数据在各院(参议院和众议院)具有可比性。与以前的研究相比,我们的研究结果对形式理论的支持要少得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号