首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Do European fiscal rules induce a bias in fiscal forecasts? Evidence from the Stability and Growth Pact
【24h】

Do European fiscal rules induce a bias in fiscal forecasts? Evidence from the Stability and Growth Pact

机译:欧洲财政规则是否会导致财政预测出现偏差?稳定与增长公约的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Enforcement of European fiscal rules, to a large extent, hinges on fiscal forecasts prepared by the European Commission (EC). The reliability of these forecasts has received little attention in the literature, despite the fact that (i) the forecasts have potentially far-reaching consequences for national governments, especially in the euro area while (ii) the EC depends on information supplied by national officials in preparing its forecasts. We hypothesize that the EC's forecasts are biased upwards when national governments expect European fiscal rules to bind. Reconstructing this expectation using real-time information, we show that for euro area countries the EC's fiscal forecasts are indeed biased upwards when the budget deficit threatens to exceed the critical value of 3 % of GDP. For non-euro area countries, which do not face the risk of fines, this bias cannot be established. Our results are robust to various ways of controlling for crisis-induced budgetary problems and the exclusion of various country groups. We offer suggestive evidence that the presence of independent fiscal councils at the national level helps to attenuate the bias induced by the 3 % threshold.
机译:欧洲财政规则的执行在很大程度上取决于欧洲委员会(EC)制定的财政预测。尽管(i)预测对各国政府,特别是在欧元区的国家政府具有潜在深远的影响,而(ii)EC依赖于国家官员提供的信息,但这些预测的可靠性在文献中很少受到关注。在准备其预测。我们假设,当各国政府期望欧洲财政法规具有约束力时,欧共体的预测将有偏差。使用实时信息重建这种期望,我们表明,当预算赤字有可能超过GDP的3%的临界值时,对于欧元区国家,欧共体的财政预测确实确实有偏差。对于不面临罚款风险的非欧元区国家,这种偏见无法成立。我们的结果对于控制由危机引起的预算问题的各种方式以及排除各个国家/地区组均具有鲁棒性。我们提供了具有启发性的证据,表明国家一级独立的财政委员会的存在有助于减轻由3%的门槛引起的偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号