首页> 外文期刊>Psychodynamic Practice: Individuals, Groups and Organisations >Cosmopolitan minds and metropolitan societies: social exclusion and social refusal revisited
【24h】

Cosmopolitan minds and metropolitan societies: social exclusion and social refusal revisited

机译:大都会思想和大都会社会:重新探讨社会排斥和社会拒绝

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we examine the dynamics of social exclusion from a psychosocial perspective, taking the system of care, representing society-as-a-whole, as a perverse system that excludes whilst simultaneously seeking to include. Our focus is as much upon the predicament of the system of care as it is upon the plight of the troubled ‘refuser’ who takes up the antisocial position and refuses to join in. We revisit the legend of Diogenes the Cynic to explore a particular kind of ideological clash in the encounter between the in-group and the outsider. We explore the nature of the transaction between, on the one hand, ‘metropolitan’, ‘city-state’ systems of care, which defensively and, we argue, offensively define their boundaries in ways that exclude (or that set unacceptable terms for the invitation to include) and, on the other hand, the excluded, ‘cosmopolitan’ seekers (or avoiders) of different kinds of asylum: ‘citizens of the uni-verse’ who withhold their allegiance to any particular earthly power. In doing so, we explore the nature and quality of the relationship between ‘us’ and ‘them’ that is established across a boundary by the particular ways in which the boundary is defined. We observe that the very real psychosocial problems associated with the homeless, the dangerous and the disordered are complex and chronic; and go on to explore the ways in which ‘we’, the safely housed and socially ordered, have a collective and shared responsibility for the co-creation of our shared problems. We conclude with an invitation to conceptualise more ‘cosmopolitan’ forms of hospitality for those who refuse to ‘come in from the cold’ on the ‘metropolitan’ terms more usually offered.
机译:在本文中,我们从社会心理角度考察了社会排斥的动力,将照顾整个社会(代表整个社会)的制度视为不正当的制度,在寻求同时又包括在内的情况除外。我们关注的焦点不仅限于护理体系的困境,也在于关注陷入困境的“拒绝者”的困境,后者陷入了反社会立场,拒绝加入。我们重温了迪奥涅斯犬儒主义者的传奇故事小组成员与局外人之间的相遇中的一种特殊的意识形态冲突。我们一方面探讨“都市”护理系统与“城市国家”护理系统之间的交易性质,这些系统在防御上(并且我们认为)以排除(或为邀请加入设置了不可接受的条件),另一方面,排除了各种庇护的“世界主义”寻求者(或回避者):“单身的公民”拒绝他们效忠于任何特定的地上力量。在此过程中,我们探索了“ us”和“ them”之间关系的性质和质量,该关系是通过定义边界的特定方式跨边界建立的。我们观察到,与无家可归者,危险者和无序者相关的非常真实的社会心理问题是复杂而长期的。并继续探索“我们”(安全住所和社会秩序)对共同创造我们共同问题负有集体和共同责任的方式。最后,我们邀请为那些拒绝以“大都市”术语提供的“大都市”款待的人概念化更多的“国际都市”款待方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号