首页> 外文期刊>Prospects >Common curriculum, core curriculum or common curriculum standards—finding a solution for Bosnia and Herzegovina
【24h】

Common curriculum, core curriculum or common curriculum standards—finding a solution for Bosnia and Herzegovina

机译:通用课程,核心课程或通用课程标准-为波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那寻找解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The article addresses the issue of possible curriculum models in post-conflict countries, taking as an example the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1996 and 2004. Following the Dayton agreement, the education system in Bosnia and Herzegovina was divided between 13 ministries administering different Bosnian, Serb and Croat cantons. Despite the functioning of some central/federal bodies with education responsibilities, such as the Ministry for Civil Affairs, the divided system of education governance created significant obstacles to the establishment of “national” quality and access frameworks encouraging national unity and mobility. Over the last ten years, developing a basic education “core curriculum” has been a major emphasis of reform efforts. This article focuses on issues such as the relative benefits of a common curriculum, a core curriculum and a curriculum framework in addressing identified deficiencies in existing curricula and contributing to societal renewal and development.
机译:本文以1996年至2004年的波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那为例,论述了冲突后国家中可能的课程模式问题。根据代顿协定,波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的教育系统由管理不同波斯尼亚人的13个部委划分。 ,塞尔维亚和克罗地亚的州。尽管诸如民政部等一些负有教育责任的中央/联邦机构发挥了作用,但教育管理体制的分裂却为建立鼓励国民团结与流动的“国家”质量和获取框架创造了重大障碍。在过去的十年中,开发基础教育“核心课程”一直是改革努力的重点。本文着重讨论诸如通用课程,核心课程和课程框架的相对收益,以解决现有课程中已发现的不足并为社会更新和发展做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号