首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Nuclear Energy >Nuclear frames in the Irish media: Implications for conversations on nuclear power generation in the age of climate change
【24h】

Nuclear frames in the Irish media: Implications for conversations on nuclear power generation in the age of climate change

机译:爱尔兰媒体中的核框架:气候变化时代有关核能发电的对话的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Keeping within the temperature limits set by the Paris Agreement on climate action will be a significant challenge. Nuclear power generation may contribute to achieving these targets, however, there are significant environmental, economic and health risks attached. Using qualitative and quantitative methods, this paper explores how nuclear power generation is framed in the Irish print media, and discusses the implications of these frames for how nuclear power is perceived within the context of climate change mitigation in Ireland. Two Irish broadsheet papers, the Irish Times and the Irish Independent were selected for data collection, focusing on Chernobyl and Fukushima incidents. The prevalence of informational and balanced articles suggest that to some extent, an open debate on nuclear is already occurring. Nevertheless, significantly more articles take an antinuclear stance (34% in 1986 and 27.5% in 2011) than pro-nuclear (2.1% in 1986 and 3.3% in 2011), reflecting the lack of public appetite for nuclear power. This may limit the potential for a wider debate to occur within the context of reducing domestic emissions. Considering the urgency of addressing climate change, a full and balanced societal debate on how nuclear power, other energy alternatives (e.g. wind) and the energy sector more generally, can contribute to national climate policy targets may be necessary.
机译:保持《巴黎协定》所规定的关于气候行动的温度极限将是一个重大挑战。核能发电可能有助于实现这些目标,但是,存在巨大的环境,经济和健康风险。本文采用定性和定量方法,探讨了爱尔兰印刷媒体如何构建核能发电框架,并讨论了这些框架对如何在爱尔兰缓解气候变化的背景下感知核电的意义。选择了两份爱尔兰的大型报纸《爱尔兰时报》和《爱尔兰独立报》进行数据收集,重点是切尔诺贝利事故和福岛事故。信息性文章和平衡文章盛行,在某种程度上表明,已经开始就核问题进行公开辩论。尽管如此,反核立场(1986年为34%,2011年为27.5%)明显多于赞成核武器(1986年为2.1%,2011年为3.3%),这反映出公众对核电的需求不足。这可能会限制在减少家庭排放的背景下进行更广泛辩论的可能性。考虑到解决气候变化的紧迫性,可能有必要就核电,其他能源替代品(例如风能)和更广泛的能源部门如何对国家气候政策目标做出贡献进行全面而平衡的社会辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号