...
【24h】

FEEDBACK

机译:反馈

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Having read Melanie Richards' excellent article on the continuing failure of boards to identify suitable female members (Summer 2014, page 35), I suggest that their search criteria is the problem. Although I already hold two non-executive positions, I continue to look for interesting opportunities and am on several mailing lists. One requirement I see again and again - and the government and NHS are some of the worst culprits - is "experience at senior level in a large organisation". This effectively disenfranchises very many talented females, who, like myself, have been highly successful with their own businesses. I might be flattering myself, but I like to think that, having been at the sharp end of a profitable manufacturing company, which I built and grew over 30 years, I have a broad breadth of business experience and knowledge that a senior executive on a specific career path in a large corporation cannot hope to emulate.
机译:阅读梅兰妮·理查兹(Melanie Richards)关于董事会持续未能找到合适的女性成员的出色文章(2014年夏季,第35页)之后,我建议寻找他们的标准是问题。尽管我已经担任过两个非执行职务,但我仍在寻找有趣的机会,并且还在多个邮件列表中。我一次又一次看到的一个要求-“政府和NHS是最糟糕的罪魁祸首”-“大型组织的高层经验”。这实际上剥夺了许多才华横溢的女性的特权,这些女性和我一样,在自己的企业中取得了巨大的成功。我可能会自以为是,但我想认为,在一家盈利的制造公司(我建立并发展了30多年)中,他处于最前沿,我拥有广泛的业务经验和知识,一位高级管理人员大型公司中的特定职业道路不能指望模仿。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Professional manager》 |2014年第autumn期|6-7|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号