首页> 外文期刊>Production and operations management >Coordinating Production and Marketing with Dynamic Transfer Prices
【24h】

Coordinating Production and Marketing with Dynamic Transfer Prices

机译:通过动态转移价格协调生产和营销

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Decentralized decision making is a fact in the modern business world accompanied by extensive research that looks into its consequences for overall firm profits. We study the interactions of decentralized marketing and operations divisions in a corporation and explore their impact on overall firm profits in the case with and without coordination of the two decentralized units. We assume that the marketing department is responsible for the price that influences the demand (sales), and the operations department is responsible for the production rate. We allow for backlogging over time. We model the interdependence involving marketing and operations decisions as a non-cooperative differential game, with the two divisions as strategically interacting players. We find that, without coordination, strategic interactions of marketing and production result in inefficiencies that can quantitatively be substantial. Next, we introduce a dynamic transfer pricing scheme as a coordination device and evaluate if it establishes efficient (first best and fully coordinated) outcomes. We show that if production and marketing play a game with pre-commitment strategies, there exists a dynamic transfer price that efficiently (fully) coordinates decentralized decision making and hence results in Pareto-efficient company profits. If the two decentralized divisions play a game without pre-commitment, dynamic transfer prices can partially coordinate decentralized decision making but fail to fully eliminate overall inefficiencies arising from strategic interactions among decentralized divisions.
机译:在现代商业世界中,分散决策是一个事实,伴随着广泛研究其对公司整体利润的影响。我们研究了公司中去中心化营销部门和运营部门之间的相互作用,并探讨了在有和没有两个去中心化部门协调的情况下,它们对公司整体利润的影响。我们假设市场部门负责影响需求(销售)的价格,而运营部门负责生产率。我们允许随着时间的推移积压。我们将涉及营销和运营决策的相互依存模型化为非合作的差异博弈,而这两个部门则是战略上相互作用的参与者。我们发现,如果没有协调,营销和生产的战略互动会导致效率低下,这在数量上可能是巨大的。接下来,我们引入动态转移定价方案作为协调工具,并评估其是否建立了有效的(最佳和完全协调的结果)结果。我们证明,如果生产和市场营销与预先承诺策略一起玩,就会存在一个动态转移价格,该价格可以有效地(充分地)协调分散决策,从而产生帕累托效率的公司利润。如果两个权力下放的部门在没有预先承诺的情况下进行博弈,那么动态转移价格可以部分协调权力下放的决策,但不能完全消除由于权力下放的部门之间的战略互动而导致的整体效率低下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号