首页> 外文期刊>Printed Circuit Design >Designing for IMPEDANCE Testing
【24h】

Designing for IMPEDANCE Testing

机译:阻抗测试设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

TDR impedance testing of high-speed boards is routine and reliable. For tighter specifications and high-speed performance on standard low-cost base materials, however, automated TDR impedance testing has its advantages. The economics apply whether the need is to test coupons or representative traces on the board. And while testing is one aspect of the equation, it is also vital to understand the production processes most likely to influence yields. Where high-volume test is required there is a choice between fixture and flying probe systems. At first look, it would seem that a fixture system would offer the best throughput. However, in contrast to bare-board testing (BBT) of opens and shorts, a TDR test takes just under one second for single-ended measurement and around 1.5 seconds for differential. Therefore, move time on a flying probe system is not a great factor in test speed. More important, a flying probe impedance tester can self-verify at the probe tip. This is achieved through the use of built-in traceable air-lines on the test table (FIGURE 1). Fixture-based testers using a matrix of RF coaxial switches cannot self-verify in this way, although in applications where a compromise in repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) is acceptable they are a valuable alternative to flying probes.
机译:高速板的TDR阻抗测试是常规且可靠的。但是,对于更严格的规格和标准低成本基础材料的高速性能,自动TDR阻抗测试具有其优势。无论是否需要在板上测试优惠券或代表性迹线,经济学都适用。尽管测试是方程式的一个方面,但了解最有可能影响产量的生产过程也至关重要。在需要进行大批量测试的地方,可以在夹具和飞行探针系统之间进行选择。乍一看,治具系统似乎可以提供最佳的吞吐量。但是,与开路和短路的裸板测试(BBT)相比,TDR测试的单端测量时间不到一秒钟,差分的时间约为1.5秒。因此,飞行探针系统上的移动时间并不是测试速度的重要因素。更重要的是,飞行探针阻抗测试仪可以在探针尖端进行自我验证。这是通过在测试台上使用内置的可追踪空气管线来实现的(图1)。使用RF同轴开关矩阵的基于夹具的测试仪无法以这种方式自我验证,尽管在可重复性和再现性(R&R)可以接受折衷的应用中,它们是飞针的宝贵替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号