首页> 外文期刊>Power Engineering >Time To Reconsider EPA's Citizens Suit Regime
【24h】

Time To Reconsider EPA's Citizens Suit Regime

机译:是时候重新考虑EPA的公民诉讼制度了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It's hard to keep up with the barrage of new EPA rules. You've probably read about EPA's new multi-billion dollar rules for electric utilities such as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) and greenhouse gas (GHG) New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), as well as EPA's new (June 2012) proposal for tighter particulate matter (PM) air quality standards. And that's just scratching the surface. even provides attorneys' fees for such plaintiffs from the U.S. Treasury. When EPA believes it will be unable to comply with a judicial deadline, it is forced to seek an extension. The degree to which the court might acquiesce is often dependent upon whether the plaintiffs agree. As a result, citizens' groups often have great bargaining power over the timing - and sometimes even the direction - of EPA's rulemaking.
机译:很难跟上新的EPA规则的冲击。您可能已经读到了有关电力公司的数十亿美元新的EPA规定,例如汞和空气有毒物标准(MATS)和温室气体(GHG)的新排放源性能标准(NSPS),以及EPA的新规定(2012年6月)关于更严格的颗粒物(PM)空气质量标准的提案。这只是表面。甚至还为美国财政部的此类原告提供律师费。当EPA认为它将无法遵守司法期限时,它被迫寻求延期。法院默认的程度通常取决于原告是否同意。结果,公民团体通常在EPA制定规则的时间(有时甚至是方向)上具有很大的议价能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Power Engineering》 |2012年第8期|p.12|共1页
  • 作者

    RICHARD G. STOLL;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号