首页> 外文期刊>Polar Record >Contrasting views on co-management of indigenous natural and cultural heritage – Case of Laponia World Heritage site, Sweden
【24h】

Contrasting views on co-management of indigenous natural and cultural heritage – Case of Laponia World Heritage site, Sweden

机译:对土着自然文化遗产共同管理的对比意见 - 瑞典拉普尼亚世界遗产案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract This article discusses the evaluation of the management of the Laponia World Heritage site (Laponia WHS) in northern Sweden. After inscription on the World Heritage list in 1996, difficulties emerged in establishing a common understanding about the involvement of various stakeholders into the site’s management model, the key point of contention being the influence of the representatives from indigenous Sami people and how that should be organised. In 2011, the management organisation led by Laponiatjuottjudus (the Sami name for the Laponia WHS management organisation) was established and implemented. This organisation gave Sami representatives a majority in the Laponia steering board and the position as chairperson in the board. This marked a remarkable shift in the Swedish national management system of land in not only handing over a state decision-making power to the local level but also to representatives of the indigenous population. The evaluation of the management model presented by Laponiatjuottjudus resulted in a number of responses from several stakeholders participating in a consultation process. These responses, from stakeholders with conflicting positions in relation to the issue described above, are the subject of this study. The analysis of these data collected reveals the existence of four major approaches or narratives to the Laponia WHS, with narratives connected to nature, the indigenous population and local governance, the economic effects of the existing system, and lastly the local community narrative. The study concludes that present management of Laponia WHS, the Laponiatjuottjudus, is a unique attempt to widen the management and planning process that partly interferes with the existing national planning model. At the same time, the analysis reveals that the Sami demands for influence over land management in the north still faces major challenges connected to its colonial legacy.
机译:摘要本文讨论了瑞典北部的拉普尼亚世界遗产(Laponia WHS)的管理评估。在1996年世界遗产名录上题字后,出现了对各利益攸关方参与该网站管理模式的共同谅解,争取的关键争论是争夺来自土着萨米人的争论的关键问题以及应如何组织。 2011年,由LaponiatJuottjudus领导的管理组织(Laponia WHS管理组织的Sami名称)成立并实施。该组织使Sami代表在拉普尼亚指导委员会和董事会主席的职位。这在瑞典国家管理系统的土地上标志着卓越的转变,而不仅涉及到地方一级的国家决策权,而且对土着人口的代表递交。 Laponiatjuottjudus提供的管理模式的评估导致了几个利益相关者参与咨询过程的响应。来自有关上述问题的利益相关者的利益攸关方,这些答复是本研究的主题。收集的这些数据的分析揭示了拉普尼亚WHS的四种主要方法或叙述,叙述与自然,土着人口和地方治理,现有制度的经济影响,最后是当地社区叙事。该研究的结论是,目前Laponia WHS的管理层,Laponiatjuottjudus的管理是扩大的管理和规划过程,这些过程部分干扰了现有的国家规划模式。与此同时,分析表明,萨米对北方土地管理影响的影响仍然面临着与其殖民遗产相关的重大挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号