首页> 外文期刊>Plant Ecology & Diversity >Pathways for below-ground carbon transfer between paper birch and Douglas-fir seedlings
【24h】

Pathways for below-ground carbon transfer between paper birch and Douglas-fir seedlings

机译:桦木与花旗松幼苗之间地下碳转移的途径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Carbon can move below ground between ectomycorrhizal plants, but the relative importance of transfer through common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) or soil pathways remains unclear. We studied carbon transfer between paper birch (Betula papyrifera) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) seedlings grown in adjacent root-restrictive pouches inside root chambers. Aims: The objective of this study was to compare transfer between CMN pathways and soil pathways by testing if: (1) carbon transfer between paper birch and Douglas-fir is bi-directional, (2) there is a net gain in carbon by one of the tree species; and (3) more carbon is transferred through the CMN pathway than the soil pathway. Methods: Following 8 months in the greenhouse, hyphal linkages crossing root pouches were either severed or left intact. Seedlings were then reciprocally labelled with 13CO2 and 14CO2. Results: We found carbon was transferred bi-directionally, with a 2-3% net gain in carbon by Douglas-fir from paper birch. Both bi-directional and net transfer occurred where the CMN was severed, but transfer was greater where it was left intact, indicating that carbon was transferred through both the soil and CMN pathways. Conclusions: Our results suggest that significant amounts of labelled carbon were transferred between plant species, showing for the first time in a balanced pulse-labelling experiment that approximately three times as much carbon was transferred through CMN pathways than soil pathways. That most carbon transfer occurred through CMNs could affect competitive interactions between establishing seedlings, favouring some included in the CMN while disadvantaging others, thus fundamentally altering our understanding of how interspecific interactions alter community structure.View full textDownload full textKeywordscarbon transfer, ectomycorrhizae, mycorrhizal networks, pulse labelling, transfer pathwaysRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2010.502564
机译:背景:碳可以在外生菌根植物之间地下移动,但是通过常见的菌根网络(CMN)或土壤途径进行转移的相对重要性仍然不清楚。我们研究了在桦木室(Betula papyrifera)和花旗松(Pseudotsuga menziesii)幼苗在根室内相邻的限制性根袋中生长之间的碳转移。目的:本研究的目的是通过测试以下情况来比较CMN途径和土壤途径之间的转移:(1)桦木和花旗松之间的碳转移是双向的,(2)碳净增加一个树种; (3)通过CMN途径传递的碳比通过土壤途径传递的碳更多。方法:在温室中放置8个月后,穿过根囊的菌丝连接被切断或保持完整。然后将幼苗分别用 13 CO 2 和 14 CO 2 进行标记。结果:我们发现碳是双向转移的,道格拉斯冷杉从纸上桦树中净吸收了2-3%的碳。双向和净转移都发生在CMN被切断的地方,但在原封不动的地方转移更大,这表明碳是通过土壤和CMN途径转移的。结论:我们的结果表明,大量标记碳在植物物种之间转移,这在平衡脉冲标记实验中首次显示,通过CMN途径转移的碳大约是土壤途径的三倍。大部分碳转移都是通过CMNs发生的,可能会影响种苗之间的竞争性相互作用,有利于CMN中的某些而不利于其他植物,因此从根本上改变了我们对种间相互作用如何改变群落结构的理解。脉冲标记,传输路径相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b “};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2010.502564

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号