首页> 外文期刊>Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy >Clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis among cigarette smokers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis among cigarette smokers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:光动力疗法作为缩放和根部施加慢性牙周炎患者慢性牙周炎的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of adjunctive photodynamic therapy (PDT) as compared to scaling and root planing (SRP) alone in the treatment of chronic periodontitis among cigarette smokers.Methods: Electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to January 2019. Randomized clinical trials (RC-Ts) with data on comparison between adjunctive PDT compared to SRP in each group were included. Primary outcomes included clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, while secondary outcomes was probing depth (PD) reduction. The weighted mean differences (WMD) of outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (Cl) for each variable were calculated using random and fixed effect models.Results: A total of 5 RCTs were included. Two clinical trials were classified as having a low risk of bias and 3 clinical trials as high risk of bias. The overall effect for CAL gain (WMD= -0.088, 95% CI= -0.40 to 0.23, p = 0.58) and PD reduction (WMD= -0.35, 95% CI = -0.87 to -0.17, p = 0.18) was not statistically significant between PDT and SRP groups at follow-up, respectively.Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it remains debatable whether PDT as an adjunct to SRP is more effective in clinical attachment level gain as compared to SRP alone in cigarette smokers given that the available scientific evidence is weak.
机译:背景:该研究的目的是评估辅助光动力治疗(PDT)的临床疗效与单独的缩放和根部刨(SRP)相比,仅在卷烟吸烟者中治疗慢性牙周炎。方法:电子数据库包括Embase,Medline, Cochrane口腔健康组试验登记册和Cochrane控制试验中央登记册预计将在2019年1月中搜索。包括随机临床试验(RC-TS)与每组SRP相比的辅助PDT之间的数据进行比较。主要结果包括临床附着水平(CAL)增益,而二次结果是探测深度(PD)减少。使用随机和固定效果模型计算每个变量的结果和95%置信度(CL)的加权平均差异(WMD)。结果:包括总共5个RCT。两项临床试验被归类为具有低偏差风险和3次临床试验,这是高偏倚风险。 CAL增益的总体效果(WMD = -0.088,95%CI = -0.40至0.23,P = 0.58)和PD减少(WMD = -0.35,95%CI = -0.87至-0.17,P = 0.18)不是在随访时,PDT和SRP组之间的统计学意义。结论:在本研究的局限内,与SRP的PDT作为临床附着水平增益中的PDT在临床附着水平增益中仍然有疑问,与单独的卷烟吸烟者相比,PDT更有效可用的科学证据很弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号