首页> 外文期刊>Philosophia >The Non-Existent God: Transcendence, Humanity, and Ethics in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas
【24h】

The Non-Existent God: Transcendence, Humanity, and Ethics in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas

机译:不存在的上帝:伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)哲学中的超越,人性和伦理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper considers three essential gestures in Levinas’s theology, highlighting in each case how Levinas’s thinking allows him to either incorporate or sidestep some of the fiercest modern criticisms of traditional theism. First, we present Levinas’s vision of divine transcendence, outlining his ontological atheism and explaining how this obviates proving the existence of God and avoids the tangles of traditional theodicy. Second, we describe Levinas’s idea of the trace, showing how a non-existent God still leaves its mark in the face of the other person and explaining how this vision of divine immanence accords with the agendas of thinkers such as Feuerbach and Nietzsche, who criticized theology that elevated God while debasing humanity. Third, we present Levinas’s insistence on the philosophical primacy of ethics, showing how he infuses his ethical philosophy with religious themes, elevating moral philosophy to the level of ultimate concern in a way that even atheist social theorists such as Marx or Freud could appreciate. We close by briefly considering limitations of Levinas’s model, discussing problems with its practical applicability and suggesting that its scope might be too narrow: both for its failure to acknowledge potential ethical demands manifest by non-human animals and the natural world and for its inability to recognize solitary or aesthetic experiences as religiously significant. This paper was delivered during the APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God.
机译:本文考虑了列维纳斯神学中的三个基本姿态,在每种情况下都突出了列维纳斯的思想如何使他能够纳入或回避一些对传统有神论的最激烈的现代批评。首先,我们介绍列维纳斯对神的超越的看法,概述他的本体论无神论,并解释这如何避免证明神的存在并避免传统神学的纠结。其次,我们描述列维纳斯的痕迹概念,展示一个不存在的神如何仍然在另一个人面前留下自己的印记,并解释这种神性内在的观念如何与诸如费尔巴哈和尼采这样的思想家的议程相一致,后者批评了在贬低人类的同时提升神的神学。第三,我们展示了列维纳斯对伦理学的哲学至上的坚持,展示了他是如何以宗教主题为伦理学注入思想的,如何以甚至无神论的社会理论家(例如马克思或弗洛伊德)也可以欣赏的方式将道德哲学提升到最终关注的程度。最后,我们简要考虑列维纳斯模型的局限性,讨论其实际适用性问题,并提出其范围可能太狭窄:既因为它未能承认非人类动物和自然世界所表现出的潜在道德要求,又因为它无法将孤独或审美经历视为具有宗教意义的意义。本文是在APA Pacific 2007年上帝模型迷你会议期间发表的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号