首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy & technology >Questioning Two Assumptions in the Metaphysics of Technological Objects
【24h】

Questioning Two Assumptions in the Metaphysics of Technological Objects

机译:质疑技术客体形而上学的两个假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There are at least two assumptions which, except for very few occasions, have not been discussed by philosophers who have written on the metaphysics of technological objects. The first assumption is that to be a technology is an absolute matter and that all technological objects are equally technological. The second assumption is that the property of being technological is abstracted from existing things which happen to have this property in common. I appeal to the definition of technological objects as problem-solving physical instruments to show that (ⅰ) things can be technological to different degrees, and that (ⅱ) the property of being technological is more fundamental than being a technology.
机译:除极少数情况外,至少有两个假设没有被写过关于技术对象的形而上学的哲学家讨论。第一个假设是,成为一项技术是绝对的问题,并且所有技术对象都是同等技术。第二个假设是,技术的性质是从碰巧具有该性质的现有事物中抽象出来的。我呼吁将技术对象定义为解决问题的物理工具,以表明(ⅰ)事物可以在不同程度上成为技术,并且(ⅱ)技术的特性比作为技术更根本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号