首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Studies >“Paging Dr. Lauben! Dr. Gustav Lauben!”: Some Questions about Individualism and Competence
【24h】

“Paging Dr. Lauben! Dr. Gustav Lauben!”: Some Questions about Individualism and Competence

机译:“为劳本博士传呼! Gustav Lauben博士!”:关于个人主义和能力的一些问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In several works, Frege argues that content is objective (i.e., thethoughts we entertain and communicate, and the senses of which theyare composed, are public, not private, property). There are, however,some remarks in the Fregean corpus that are in tension with this view.This paper is centered on an investigation of the most notorious andextreme such passage: the `Dr. Lauben example, from Frege (1918). Aprincipal aim is to attain more clarity on the evident tension withinFreges views on content, between this dominant objectivism and someelements that seem to run counter to it, via developing an understandingof the `Dr. Lauben example. Then I will argue that this interpretation goes some way toward undermining some prevalent contemporary viewsabout language. Based on the advice of Dr. Lauben, I will argue againsta certain understanding of the causal-historical theory of reference –more specifically, of the phenomenon of deferential uses of linguisticexpressions – upon which these views are premised, and I will drawout some morals that pertain to individualism and competence.
机译:弗雷格(Frege)在几本作品中都认为内容是客观的(即我们娱乐和交流的思想,以及它们构成的感觉是公共的,而不是私有的)。但是,弗雷格语语料库中有一些言论与此观点有些矛盾。本文的重点是对这样的最臭名昭著和极端的文章的调查:劳本的例子,来自弗雷格(1918)。主要目的是通过发展对“博士”的理解,使弗雷格斯在内容观上的明显张力变得更加清晰,这种张力在这种主要的客观主义和似乎与之相反的某些要素之间。劳本的例子。然后,我将辩解说,这种解释在某种程度上削弱了当今关于语言的普遍观点。根据劳本博士的建议,我将反对对因果关系-历史指称理论的某种理解-更具体地说,是对语言表达的贬义使用现象的前提,这些观点是以此为前提的,并且我将提出一些道德观念,与个人主义和能力有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号