首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on science >Experience, Pedagogy, and the Study of Terrestrial Magnetism
【24h】

Experience, Pedagogy, and the Study of Terrestrial Magnetism

机译:经验,教学法和地磁研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 1842, British astronomer Sir John Herschel wrote a letter to Carl Fried-rich Gauss seeking his advice about how to make data collection more efficient on the Magnetic Crusade, a large-scale initiative to study the earth's magnetic field. Surprisingly, even though Gauss had managed a similar initiative, he refused to give Herschel the advice he wanted, claiming that he needed to see Herschel's results before he could reply. Taking this miscommuni-cation as a point of departure, this article traces the cause of this miscommu-nication to differences in how each scientist viewed scientific training and the communicability of different kinds of scientific knowledge.
机译:1842年,英国天文学家约翰·赫歇尔爵士(Sir John Herschel)给卡尔·弗里德里希·高斯(Carl Fried-rich Gauss)写了一封信,征求他的建议,以使如何利用“磁十字军东征”提高数据收集效率,这是研究地球磁场的大规模计划。令人惊讶的是,即使高斯采取了类似的举措,他也拒绝向赫歇尔提供他想要的建议,声称他需要先了解赫歇尔的结果,然后才能做出回应。本文以这种沟通不畅为出发点,将这种沟通不畅的原因追溯到每个科学家如何看待科学训练以及不同种类的科学知识的可传播性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号