首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >DOWN WITH NATURAL SELECTION?*
【24h】

DOWN WITH NATURAL SELECTION?*

机译:自然选择下来?*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biologists are increasingly reexamining the conceptual structure of evolutionary theory, which dates back to the so-called Modern Synthesis of the 1930s and 1940s. Calls for an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) cite a number of empirical and theoretical advances that need to be accounted for, including evolvability, evolutionary novelties, capacitors of phenotypic evolution, developmental plasticity, and phenotypic attractors. In Biological Emergences, however, Robert Reid outlines a theory of evolution in which natural selection plays no role or-worse-actually impedes evolution by what Reid calls "natural experimentation." For Reid, biological complexity emerges because of intrinsic mechanisms that work in opposition to natural selection, a view that would reopen old questions of orthogenesis and Lamarckism. This review outlines why we do need an EES, but also why it is unlikely to take the shape that Reid advocates. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:生物学家越来越多地重新审视进化论的概念结构,这种结构可以追溯到1930年代和1940年代的所谓现代综合。呼吁扩展进化综合(EES)引用了许多经验和理论上的进步,需要加以考虑,包括可进化性,进化新奇,表型进化的电容器,发育可塑性和表型吸引子。然而,在《生物出现》一书中,罗伯特·里德(Robert Reid)概述了一种进化理论,其中自然选择不起作用,或者更糟糕的是实际上被瑞德所说的“自然实验”阻碍了进化。对于里德来说,生物复杂性的出现是由于与自然选择相反的内在机制起作用的,这种观点将重新提出人工成因和拉马克主义的古老问题。这篇评论概述了为什么我们确实需要EES,也解释了为什么它不太可能像Reid倡导的那样。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Perspectives in Biology and Medicine》 |2009年第1期|p.134-140|共7页
  • 作者

    Massimo Pigliucci;

  • 作者单位

    Departments of Ecology and Evolution and of Philosophy, 650 Life Science Building, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794.E-mail: pigliucci@genotypebyenvironment.org.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号