...
首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >Thermo Fisher seeks reconsideration of time-bar ruling, says limit in §113(g)(3) does not apply to §113(f)(3)(B)
【24h】

Thermo Fisher seeks reconsideration of time-bar ruling, says limit in §113(g)(3) does not apply to §113(f)(3)(B)

机译:赛默飞世尔(Thermo Fisher)寻求对时限裁决的重新考虑,称§113(g)(3)中的限制不适用于§113(f)(3)(B)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Citing an opinion by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Fisher Scientific Inc. moved on April 17 for reconsideration of the decision which held that its CERCLA §113(f)(3)(B) contribution claim for a cost-recovery settlement is time-barred with respect to contamination at the Fair Lawn Well Fields Superfund Site in New Jersey.
机译:引用美国肯塔基州西区地方法院的意见,Fisher Scientific Inc.于4月17日提出重新考虑该裁决的决定,该裁决裁定其CERCLA§113(f)(3)(B)供款索赔为在新泽西州的Fair Lawn Well Fields超级基金站点,关于污染的回收解决是有时间限制的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号