...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric and Developmental Pathology >Distinguishing Undifferentiated Embryonal Sarcoma of the Liver from Biliary Tract Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Children's Oncology Group Study
【24h】

Distinguishing Undifferentiated Embryonal Sarcoma of the Liver from Biliary Tract Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Children's Oncology Group Study

机译:从胆道横纹肌肉瘤中区分出肝脏未分化的胚胎肉瘤:儿童肿瘤学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Morphologically, the distinction between undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) and biliary tract rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) can be uncertain because of some shared pathologic similarities. Patients with UESL have been consistently but erroneously enrolled in Children's Oncology Group (COG) treatment protocols because UESL was equated with RMS, despite the differing primary treatment modalities of these entities. Review of COG pathology files yielded 20 cases of UESL that were compared to 25 cases of biliary tract RMS. Clinicopathologic features including immunohistochemical staining were examined. In the UESL cases, the male:female ratio was 1:1 and the median age was 10.5 years. Histologically, hyaline globules and diffuse anaplasia were consistently present. The cases of RMS had a male:female ratio of 1.8:1 with a median age of 3.4 years and routinely lacked diffuse anaplasia and hyaline globules. Polyclonal desmin and muscle-specific actin were variably immunoreactive in UESL and RMS; however, myogenin and myogenic regulatory protein D1 (MyoD1) were uniformly negative in UESL and routinely positive in the majority of biliary tract RMS. Myogenin, in particular, was highly significant (P = 0.0003) in distinguishing RMS from UESL. With a median follow-up of 8 months, 11 of 18 patients with UESL were still alive. The estimated 5-year survival for biliary tract RMS was 66%. Establishing the correct diagnosis of these distinct clinical and pathologic entities is important, as surgery alone may be curative in UESL, whereas initial chemotherapy is often recommended for the treatment of biliary tract RMS.
机译:在形态上,由于某些共同的病理相似性,肝脏未分化的胚胎肉瘤(UESL)和胆道横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)之间的区别可能不确定。尽管UESL与RMS等同,但UESL的患者始终如一地但错误地参加了儿童肿瘤组(COG)治疗方案,尽管这些实体的主要治疗方式不同。回顾COG病理学档案可得出20例UESL,而25例胆道RMS比较。检查了包括免疫组织化学染色在内的临床病理特征。在UESL病例中,男女比例为1:1,中位年龄为10.5岁。在组织学上,透明小球和弥漫性发育不全一直存在。 RMS患者的男女比例为1.8:1,中位年龄为3.4岁,并且通常没有弥漫性发育不全和透明性小球。多克隆结蛋白和肌肉特异性肌动蛋白在UESL和RMS中具有不同的免疫反应性。然而,肌成蛋白和肌源调节蛋白D1(MyoD1)在UESL中均呈阴性,而在大多数胆道RMS中通常呈阳性。特别是,肌生成素在区分RMS和UESL方面具有很高的意义(P = 0.0003)。中位随访8个月,UESL的18例患者中有11例还活着。估计的胆道RMS的5年生存率为66%。对这些不同的临床和病理实体进行正确的诊断很重要,因为单独手术可能是UESL的治愈方法,而通常建议采用初始化学疗法治疗胆道RMS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号