...
首页> 外文期刊>Pedagogy, Culture & Society >‘Undoing’ the self: should heterosexual teachers ‘come out’ in the university classroom?
【24h】

‘Undoing’ the self: should heterosexual teachers ‘come out’ in the university classroom?

机译:“不做”自我:异性恋教师应该在大学教室里“出来”吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The issue of whether to ‘come out’ in class has a poignant history in the literature by gay, lesbian and bisexual educators on this topic. By comparison few heterosexuals have publicly written about whether they explicitly reveal their heterosexuality to students. This paper contributes to the enduring debate about whether to ‘come out’ in class from the perspective of a heterosexual. It explores the questions: Should heterosexuals come out in class? Can this serve as a pedagogically effective strategy for those striving to achieve anti‐heteronormative classrooms? The arguments for and against coming out by lesbian, gay and bisexual writers are canvassed to discern which are relevant for heterosexuals. I argue that the question of whether to come out is as pedagogically relevant to heterosexuals as those who are gay, lesbian and bisexual. Failing to identify explicitly as heterosexual can serve to reinforce the homosexual-heterosexual binary, where silence about heterosexual identity maintains its ‘normal’ and ‘natural’ status. I also contend that ‘coming out’ as heterosexual necessitates a strategy that undermines the dominance of this identity (which an assertion of this identity can reinforce). To come out by ‘undoing’ the heterosexual self is offered as one approach to this dilemma. This ‘undoing’ strives to denaturalise and decentre heterosexual identity and the heteronormative practices which sustain its privileged position.View full textDownload full textKeywordsheterosexualities, coming out, pedagogy, anti‐heteronormativeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.548990
机译:在课堂上是否“脱颖而出”的问题在男女同性恋,双性恋和双性恋教育者的文学作品中都有令人痛苦的历史。相比之下,很少有异性恋者公开发表关于他们是否向学生明确表明自己的异性恋的文章。本文为从异性恋者的角度在课堂上“脱颖而出”的持久辩论做出了贡献。它探讨了以下问题:异性恋者应该在课堂上出来吗?对于那些努力实现反范式标准化教室的人来说,这可以作为一种教学上有效的策略吗?女同性恋,男同性恋和双性恋作家提出和反对的论据被拉开帷幕,以辨别与异性恋有关的。我认为,是否出来的问题在教育学上与异性恋者在同性恋,双性恋和双性恋者中一样重要。没有明确地识别为异性恋者可以加强同性恋-异性恋的二元性,对异性恋身份的沉默保持其“正常”和“自然”状态。我还认为,“出来”是异性恋,因此有必要采取一种削弱这种身份优势的策略(这种主张可以加强这种策略)。通过“撤消”出来,异性恋自我是解决这一难题的一种方法。这种“撤消”努力使维持其特权地位的异性恋身份和异性规范行为自然化和分散化。查看全文下载全文关键字sheterosexualities,现身,教学法,反义词异性规范相关变量var addthis_config = { ”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.548990

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号