首页> 外文期刊>Peabody Journal of Education >A Narrow Path Through the Broad Middle: Mapping Institutional Considerations for ESEA Reauthorization
【24h】

A Narrow Path Through the Broad Middle: Mapping Institutional Considerations for ESEA Reauthorization

机译:跨越广阔中路的狭窄道路:ESEA重新授权的制度考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article uses an institutional framework to analyze the political context of the next reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The authors analyze three relevant factors in the institutional environment: the role of traditional party politics, including theories of divided versus unified party government; the entrance of new players, both interest groups and think tanks, into the education policy arena; and stresses on the traditional coalition that historically supported education reform. The authors compare DW-Nominate ratings for the 107th Congress (which passed the No Child Left Behind Act) and the 111th Congress (which concluded in 2010) to measure the ideology of members of the education committees and the Congress as a whole. Although both education committees have witnessed aggregate shifts in a more conservative direction, the authors argue that the 112th Congress, which convenes for the first time in January 2011, is unlikely to pass President Obama's centrist education agenda, as a majority-Republican House, ideological divisions within each political party, and the politics of an upcoming presidential election are factors that militate against a bill's enactment before 2012.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2011.579009
机译:本文使用一种制度框架来分析下次重新授权《中小学教育法》的政治背景。作者分析了制度环境中的三个相关因素:传统的政党政治的作用,包括分立政党与统一党政的理论;利益集团和智囊团的新参与者进入教育政策领域;并强调历史上支持教育改革的传统联盟。作者比较了第107届国会(通过了“不让任何孩子落伍”法案)和第111届国会(于2010年结束)的DW提名等级,以衡量教育委员会和国会整体成员的意识形态。尽管两个教育委员会的目光都朝着更加保守的方向发展,但作者们认为,作为多数派共和党人的意识形态,2011年1月首次召开的第112届国会不太可能通过奥巴马总统的中间派教育议程每个政党内部的分歧以及即将举行的总统大选的政治因素,都不利于该法案在2012年之前的颁布。查看全文下载全文twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2011.579009

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号