首页> 外文期刊>The Leadership & Organization Development Journal >Organizational knowledge creation practice Comprehensive and systematic processes for scale development
【24h】

Organizational knowledge creation practice Comprehensive and systematic processes for scale development

机译:组织知识创造实践规模发展的全面,系统的过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop and validate a measurement tool for assessing organizational knowledge creation practices based on the socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (SECI) processes of the knowledge creation theory. Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected from a sample of 455 knowledge workers from four Korean for-profit organizations, utilizing a systematic procedure, which includes: initial item and domain development based on a comprehensive literature review, reliability assessment and item deduction, and construct validity and psychometric property assessment. Findings - Results show that 17 items related to individual and team members' practices of acquiring and sharing knowledge in organizational contexts measure the four domains of SECI knowledge creation practices. Research limitations/implications - Although samples from Korean business settings indicate a limited generalizability, this study's theory-grounded item specification and systematic procedure of scale development (i.e. descriptive statistics, reliability and inter-correlation analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using the random split method) can be replicated in future similar studies or scale development research. Originality/value - Scores at the individual, group, or firm level can be utilized for comparison or development purposes to promote the collaborative knowledge creation practices in organizations.
机译:目的-本文的目的是基于知识创造理论的社会化,外部化,组合和内部化(SECI)过程,开发和验证一种用于评估组织知识创造实践的度量工具。设计/方法/方法-数据是从韩国四个营利组织的455名知识工作者的样本中收集的,采用了系统性的程序,包括:基于全面文献综述的初始项目和领域开发,可靠性评估和项目推论,并建立效度和心理计量学评估。结果-结果显示,与个人和团队成员在组织环境中获取和共享知识的实践有关的17个项目衡量了SECI知识创造实践的四个领域。研究的局限性/意义-尽管来自韩国企业环境的样本表明通用性有限,但该研究基于理论的项目规范和规模发展的系统程序(即描述性统计,可靠性和相互关系分析,使用随机拆分的探索性和确认性因素分析方法)可以在以后的类似研究或规模开发研究中复制。原创性/价值-可以将个人,团体或公司级别的分数用于比较或开发目的,以促进组织中的协作式知识创建实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号