首页> 外文期刊>Oryx >To name those lost: assessing extinction likelihood in the Australian vascular flora
【24h】

To name those lost: assessing extinction likelihood in the Australian vascular flora

机译:列举失去的人:评估澳大利亚维管束物种灭绝的可能性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Extinction is a profound biological event, yet despite its finality it can be difficult to verify and many frameworks have been proposed to define formally that extinction has occurred. For most taxonomic groups and regions there is no reliable list of species considered to be probably or possibly extinct. The record of plant extinctions in Australia is no exception, characterized by high turn-over within lists, low transparency of attribution and lack of consistency between jurisdictions. This makes it impossible to evaluate how many plant taxa have become extinct in Australia. We present an ecological framework for assessing the likelihood of plant extinctions, based on taxonomic soundness, degree of habitat modification, detectability and search effort, underpinned by the best available expert knowledge. We show that, in sharp contrast to both the fate of the Australian fauna and prevailing assumptions, only 12 of 71 plant taxa currently listed as or assumed to be extinct are considered probably extinct, and a further 21 possibly extinct. Twenty taxa listed as or assumed to be extinct have dubious taxonomy or occurrence in Australia, and the remaining 18 taxa are considered possibly extant and further surveys are required to ascertain their status. The list of probably and possibly extinct plants is dwarfed by the number thought extinct but rediscovered since 1980. Our method can be used for vascular floras in other regions characterized by well-documented and curated floras and high levels of expert knowledge, and provides a transparent platform for assessing changes in the status of biodiversity.
机译:灭绝是一个深远的生物学事件,尽管它具有终结性,但仍难以验证,并且提出了许多框架来正式定义灭绝已经发生。对于大多数生物分类群和地区,没有可靠的物种清单,认为这些物种可能已经灭绝。澳大利亚的植物灭绝记录也不例外,其特征在于清单内的周转率高,归因的透明度低以及辖区之间缺乏一致性。这使得无法评估澳大利亚有多少种植物已经灭绝。我们以最佳的专业知识为基础,根据分类学的合理性,生境改变的程度,可检测性和搜索工作,提出了一个评估植物灭绝可能性的生态框架。我们发现,与澳大利亚动物区系的命运和普遍的假设形成鲜明对比的是,在目前列为或假设已灭绝的71种植物分类中,只有12种可能被认为灭绝,而另外21种可能被灭绝。在澳大利亚,被列为或被认为已灭绝的二十个生物分类具有可疑的分类或发生的情况,其余18个生物分类被认为可能已经存在,需要进一步调查以确定其地位。自从1980年以来已灭绝但重新发现的数量以来,可能灭绝的植物种类已相形见.。我们的方法可用于其他地区的血管植物区系,其特征是文件齐全,精心挑选的植物区系和高水平的专业知识,并且提供了透明的信息。评估生物多样性状况变化的平台。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oryx》 |2020年第2期|167-177|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Queensland Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci Natl Environm Sci Program Threatened Species Recovery Hub St Lucia Qld 4072 Australia;

    James Cook Univ Australian Trop Herbarium Cairns Australia|Brisbane Bot Gardens Queensland Herbarium Dept Environm & Sci Toowong Australia;

    Royal Bot Gardens Victoria Birdwood Ave Melbourne Vic Australia;

    Univ Queensland Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci Natl Environm Sci Program Threatened Species Recovery Hub St Lucia Qld 4072 Australia|Brisbane Bot Gardens Queensland Herbarium Dept Environm & Sci Toowong Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Australia; conservation assessment; extinction; flora; taxonomy; threatened species; surveys;

    机译:澳大利亚;养护评估;灭绝植物区系分类;受威胁物种;调查;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号