首页> 外文期刊>Organizational Research Methods >Divided We Fall: How Ratios Undermine Research in Strategic Management
【24h】

Divided We Fall: How Ratios Undermine Research in Strategic Management

机译:分崩离析:比率如何破坏战略管理研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite scholars' admonitions regarding the use of ratios in statistical analyses, the practice is common in management research. This is particularly true in the area of strategic management, where important variables of interest are operationalized as ratios. In this study, we employ simulations to demonstrate the implications of using ratios in statistical analyses. Our simulations illustrate that ratio variables produce inaccurate parameter estimates and can result in lower levels of statistical power (i.e., the ability to uncover hypothesized relationships). We also find that when an independent or a dependent variable is a ratio, the relationship between the independent and dependent variable fluctuates as the dispersion of the denominator changes. These fluctuations occur even when the correlations between the unscaled variables remain exactly the same. We also find that including ratios in models as control variables influences estimates of relationships between focal independent and dependent variables. This is true even when neither the independent or dependent variable is a ratio. We provide several recommendations for researchers who may be interested in avoiding the pitfalls of ratio variables.
机译:尽管学者们劝告人们在统计分析中使用比率,但这种做法在管理研究中很常见。在战略管理领域尤其如此,其中重要的重要变量以比率进行操作。在这项研究中,我们使用模拟来证明在统计分析中使用比率的含义。我们的仿真表明,比率变量产生的参数估算值不准确,并且可能导致较低的统计功效(即发现假设关系的能力)。我们还发现,当自变量或因变量是比率时,自变量和因变量之间的关系会随着分母的离散度变化而波动。即使未缩放变量之间的相关性保持完全相同,也会发生这些波动。我们还发现,在模型中包含比率作为控制变量会影响焦点独立变量和因变量之间的关系估计。即使自变量或因变量都不是比率也是如此。我们为可能有兴趣避免比率变量陷阱的研究人员提供了一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号