首页> 外文期刊>Organizational Research Methods >The Practical Utility of Importance Measures in Assessing the Relative Importance of Work-Related Perceptions and Organizational Characteristics on Work-Related Outcomes
【24h】

The Practical Utility of Importance Measures in Assessing the Relative Importance of Work-Related Perceptions and Organizational Characteristics on Work-Related Outcomes

机译:重要指标在评估与工作相关的观念和与工作相关的成果的组织特征的相对重要性中的实际作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The utility of dominance analysis and other importance indices is the subject of much debate in determining the relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. The goal in conducting this research was to bring an applied perspective to this issue by comparing the conclusions one would draw regarding predictors' relative importance, when using various indices of importance with real-world data sets. The overall results indicate that researchers would reach only minor differences in their conclusions when using dominance analysis or other importance indices as compared to simply examining the traditional standardized beta weights or squared semipartial correlations. The lack of differences in conclusions drawn is particularly apparent when comparing the rank ordering of the predictor importance produced by the different indices.
机译:在确定多元回归中预测变量的相对重要性时,优势分析和其他重要性指标的实用性是许多争论的主题。进行这项研究的目的是,通过比较将各种重要性指标与实际数据集结合使用时得出的关于预测变量相对重要性的结论,从而为该问题提供实用的观点。总体结果表明,与仅检查传统的标准化β权重或平方的半偏相关性相比,使用优势分析或其他重要性指标时,研究人员的结论仅会产生很小的差异。当比较不同指标产生的预测变量重要性的等级顺序时,得出的结论缺乏差异尤其明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号