首页> 外文期刊>Organizational Research Methods >Doing the Right Thing or Doing the Thing Right: Implications of Participant Withdrawal
【24h】

Doing the Right Thing or Doing the Thing Right: Implications of Participant Withdrawal

机译:做正确的事或做正确的事:参与者退出的含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article discusses implications of participant withdrawal for inductive research. I describe and analyze how a third of my participants withdrew from a grounded theory study. I position my example, ensuing issues, and potential solutions as reflective of inductive methodologies as a whole. The crux of the problem is the disruption inflicted by withdrawal on inductive processes of generating knowledge. I examine the subsequent methodological and ethical issues in trying to determine the best course of action following withdrawal. I suggest three potential options for researchers: Continuing the study with partial data, continuing the study with all data, and discontinuing the study. Motivated by my experience, and wider theoretical considerations, I present several suggestions and questions, with the aim of supporting researchers in determining the best course of action for their individual field circumstances.
机译:本文讨论了参与者退出对归纳研究的影响。我描述并分析了三分之一的参与者如何退出扎根的理论研究。我将自己的榜样,后续问题和可能的解决方案定位为整个归纳方法论的反映。问题的症结在于撤回对知识的归纳过程造成的破坏。我研究了随后的方法论和道德问题,试图确定撤退后的最佳行动方案。我为研究人员提出了三种可能的选择:使用部分数据继续进行研究,使用所有数据继续进行研究,以及中止研究。基于我的经验和更广泛的理论考虑,我提出了一些建议和问题,目的是支持研究人员确定适合其各自领域的最佳行动方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号