首页> 外文期刊>Omega >A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy
【24h】

A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy

机译:具有政府补贴的WEEE回收市场基于质量的双通道价格竞争模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is quite common to find both formal and informal sectors for processing waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in many emerging countries. Typically, the formal channel consists of recyclers with official qualifications for disassembling WEEE while the informal channel is dominated by unregulated recyclers. We develop a quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market in a dual channel environment comprising both formal and informal sectors. The equilibrium acquisition prices and effects of government subsidy in the two channels are examined under four competitive scenarios. While government subsidy can support the formal sector, our analysis shows that at a higher quality level of waste, the marginal effect of subsidy is not as promising. When the quality of waste is high but the government subsidy is not substantial, the informal sector always has a competitive advantage. To promote the healthy development of the recycling industry the government should adjust the subsidy appropriately to limit the quality of waste at a high level suitable only for refurbishing in the informal sector. Our study also shows that both the formal and informal channels prefer high quality products. However, the informal recycler always has a better acquisition price to capture a bigger market share of used products than the formal recycler at the quality level of refurbishing for both recyclers. In a quality-pricing environment, as quality increases the acquisition prices in the two channels may crossover. This indicates that neither of the two channels always have a clear price advantage at all quality levels. We will not be able to obtain this result in a uniform pricing model. As such product quality is an important factor to consider in a competitive recycling market. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在许多新兴国家中,找到正规部门和非正式部门来处理废旧电气和电子设备(WEEE)是很普遍的。通常,正式渠道由具有拆卸WEEE官方资格的回收商组成,而非正式渠道则由不受监管的回收商主导。我们在包括正式和非正式部门的双渠道环境中为WEEE回收市场开发了基于质量的价格竞争模型。在四种竞争情景下,考察了两种渠道的均衡收购价格和政府补贴的效果。尽管政府补贴可以支持正规部门,但我们的分析表明,在废物质量更高的情况下,补贴的边际效应并不那么令人满意。当废物的质量很高但政府补贴不高时,非正规部门总是具有竞争优势。为了促进回收行业的健康发展,政府应适当调整补贴,将废物质量限制在高水平,仅适用于非正规部门的翻新。我们的研究还表明,正式和非正式渠道都更喜欢高质量的产品。然而,在两个翻新商的翻新质量水平上,非正式的回收商总是比正式的回收商具有更高的收购价格,以获取更大的二手产品市场份额。在质量定价环境中,随着质量的提高,两个渠道中的收购价格可能会交叉。这表明两个渠道在所有质量水平上都没有明显的价格优势。我们将无法以统一的定价模型获得此结果。因此,产品质量是在竞争激烈的回收市场中要考虑的重要因素。 (c)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号