首页> 外文期刊>Omega >A note on 'Cooperative advertising, game theory and manufacturer-retailer supply chains'
【24h】

A note on 'Cooperative advertising, game theory and manufacturer-retailer supply chains'

机译:关于“合作广告,博弈论和制造商-零售商供应链”的注释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This note extends the results in the manufacturer-dominated game model of the paper by Li et al. (Omega 30 (2002) 347) to the case where the manufacturer's marginal profit is not large enough. In such situations, the profit of the entire supply chain under the co-op advertising mode is higher than the one under the Stackelberg game, which is consistent with the results of the original paper. However, the advertising expenditures of the manufacturer and the retailer under the co-op advertising model are not always larger than those under the Stackelberg game, which is different from the results of the original paper. Furthermore, the results are also compared with the simultaneous move game of the paper by Huang and Li (Eur. J. Oper. Res. 135 (2001) 527). The manufacturer always prefers the leader-follower structure rather than the simultaneous move structure, which is consistent with the results of the original paper. However, the retailer always prefers the simultaneous move structure rather than the leader-follower structure, which differs from the results of the original paper.
机译:该注释扩展了Li等人在论文的制造商主导的游戏模型中的结果。 (Omega 30(2002)347)的情况下,制造商的边际利润不够大。在这种情况下,合作广告模式下整个供应链的利润要高于Stackelberg博弈下的利润,这与原论文的结果是一致的。但是,合作广告模式下制造商和零售商的广告支出并不总是比Stackelberg游戏下的广告支出大,这与原始论文的结果不同。此外,还将结果与Huang和Li的论文同时移动博弈进行比较(Eur。J. Oper。Res。135(2001)527)。与原始纸的结果一致,制造商总是更喜欢导纸器从动结构而不是同时移动结构。但是,零售商始终喜欢同时移动结构而不是领导者跟随者结构,这与原始论文的结果有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号