首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Expert perceptions of the 'freak' wave myth on Australia's rocky coasts
【24h】

Expert perceptions of the 'freak' wave myth on Australia's rocky coasts

机译:专家对澳大利亚多岩石海岸“怪​​异”波浪神话的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hazardous rocky coasts are a leading site for coastal drowning deaths worldwide. Between 2004 and 2017, 149 rock fishers have drowned on Australia's rocky coasts, making rock fishing one of Australia's deadliest sports. Most portrayals of drowning frame the event with high-energy waves inundating shore platforms, washing fishers off balance and into the ocean. The physical risk of overtopping waves is known, yet few studies have explored how fishers perceive overtopping wave hazards, or how experience influences those perceptions. Using semi-structured interviews (n = 52) with rock fishers of varying experience, this study explores the visual cues that activate a fisher's response to an anticipated hazard. We consider experienced fishers uncertified risk 'experts', whose recurring first-hand experience informs their expertise. The goal of this study is to explore how closely 'expert' perceptions align with drowning incidents and to contrast their perceptions with the risk of 'freak waves', a prevailing framing used by the media and government in response to drownings. We explore experienced fishers' testimonies, demonstrating their attribution of drownings to inexperienced fishers' inability to perceive the absence of risk during longer wave periods. During longer wave periods, the wave length and time between overtopping waves increases, giving the sea a more 'safe' appearance. To compare expert testimonies with drowning data, a wave hindcasting model was used to identify what, if any, mean coastal conditions fluctuated when fishers drowned. This was done by comparing the daily mean significant wave height, direction, and period (2005-2018) in two drowning black spot locations with the mean daily values when fishers drowned. Results show that the wave period at both sites was longer than average at the time of drownings, supporting expert perceptions of longer wave periods being associated with fishers drowning. We argue experiential expert's knowledge could be incorporated into existing risk management to accommodate the ways that experienced and inexperienced fishers anticipate and perceive risk during longer wave periods.
机译:危险多岩石的海岸是全世界沿海溺水死亡的主要地点。在2004年至2017年之间,有149名岩石钓鱼者在澳大利亚多岩石的海岸淹死,这使岩石钓鱼成为澳大利亚最致命的运动之一。溺水的大多数描述都是通过高能波淹没海岸平台,使渔民失去平衡并进入海洋来构成事件的。顶浪的物理风险是已知的,但很少有研究探索渔民如何感知顶浪的危害,或经验如何影响这些看法。通过对不同经验的岩钓者进行半结构化访谈(n = 52),本研究探索了激活钓者对预期危害的视觉提示。我们认为经验丰富的渔民是未经认证的风险“专家”,他们的经常性第一手经验可以帮助他们了解专业知识。这项研究的目的是探究“专家”的观念与溺水事件的接近程度,并将其观念与“怪胎浪潮”的风险进行对比,“怪胎浪潮”是媒体和政府对溺水的一种流行框架。我们探索了经验丰富的渔民的证词,证明了他们溺水的原因是缺乏经验的渔民无法在较长的波浪期中感知到没有风险。在较长的波浪周期中,两次颠覆波之间的波长和时间会增加,从而使海洋看起来更“安全”。为了将专家的证词与溺水数据进行比较,采用了波后预报模型来确定渔民溺水时沿海状况的波动(如果有的话)。这是通过将两个溺水黑点的日平均重要波高,方向和周期(2005-2018年)与渔民溺水时的日平均值进行比较来完成的。结果表明,两个地点的波浪期都比溺水时的平均时间长,这支持了专家们认为更长的波浪期与渔民溺水有关。我们认为经验专家的知识可以纳入现有的风险管理中,以适应经验丰富和经验不足的渔民在较长波浪时期内预期和感知风险的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号