【24h】

Ec Shifts On Safety

机译:安全方面的EC转变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Back in 2003, it had seemed like such a good idea, at least to the European Commission (EC). Nuclear energy safety lapses can have transnational consequences and so surely the European Union (EU) should have an active role in making sure its member states' nuclear power plants are safe? After all, there are EU agencies controlling the safety of food, chemicals, civil aviation, shipping and a host of other issues - so why not nuclear power? A directive was duly proposed detailing powers and responsibility for the EU in nuclear safety. Well, as it turned out, national governments just did not like this idea. Nuclear power proved just too strategic an industry for member states to want to hand over authority to Brussels, and the proposal ran into the sand, which is where it has stayed.
机译:早在2003年,这似乎是一个好主意,至少对于欧洲委员会(EC)而言。核能安全失误会产生跨国后果,因此,欧洲联盟(EU)当然应该在确保其成员国核电厂安全方面发挥积极作用吗?毕竟,有欧盟机构控制着食品,化学品,民航,航运和其他许多问题的安全-那么为什么不使用核电呢?正式提出了一项指令,详细说明了欧盟在核安全方面的权力和责任。事实证明,各国政府只是不喜欢这个想法。事实证明,核电对于成员国来说想将权力移交给布鲁塞尔来说太过具有战略意义,因此该提案陷入了僵局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号