首页> 外文期刊>NHSA Dialog >Does Brief In-Service Training Help Teachers Increase Turn-Taking Talk and Socratic Questions With Low-Income Preschoolers?
【24h】

Does Brief In-Service Training Help Teachers Increase Turn-Taking Talk and Socratic Questions With Low-Income Preschoolers?

机译:简短的在职培训是否可以帮助教师增加与低收入学龄前儿童的轮番交谈和有关社会问题的问题?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined effects of 1-session training to increase 2 targeted teacher language behaviors: use of Socratic (open-ended) questions and length of turn-taking conversations with low-income preschoolers. Teachers, matched in 21 pairs for education, age, and training in early childhood education, were assigned to E (experimental) or C (contrast) group. Classroom observations of language interactions were taped (via a microcassette recorder hung around each teacher''s neck) in pretest observations. Then, in small groups, E teachers attended a 2.5-hr intensive and interactive language enhancement workshop. Classroom observations were taped 2 weeks later. At that time, after their training session, E teachers'' turn-taking conversation lengths were significantly longer than C teachers, F(1, 40) = 7.22, p = < .01. When the E and C teachers were observed in the classroom 3 months later, E and C teachers did not differ in either of the targeted language interaction techniques. Changing teacher language interaction patterns may require more intensive and extensive sessions as well as ongoing in-classroom supports.
机译:这项研究检查了一次培训的效果,以增加两种针对性的教师语言行为:使用苏格拉底(开放式)问题以及与低收入学龄前儿童进行轮流交谈的时间。将教师分为21对,在教育,年龄和早期儿童教育方面进行配对,分配给E(实验)或C(对比)组。在课堂前的观察中,将课堂上对语言交互作用的观察结果录音(通过悬挂在每个老师脖子上的微型盒式录音机)录音。然后,以小组形式,E老师参加了一个为时2.5小时的强化互动语言增强研讨会。 2周后将课堂观察结果录音。那时,培训结束后,E老师的轮流交谈时间明显长于C老师,F(1,40)= 7.22,p = <.01。 3个月后在教室里观察到E和C老师时,E和C老师在目标语言交互技术上都没有差异。改变老师的语言互动方式可能需要更密集,更广泛的会议以及持续的课堂支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号