首页> 外文期刊>Neuro-Oncology >A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease
【24h】

A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease

机译:手术与常规放疗治疗转移性硬脊膜硬膜外疾病的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Radiotherapy has been the primary therapy for managing metastatic spinal disease; however, surgery that decompresses the spinal cord circumferentially, followed by reconstruction and immediate stabilization, has also proven effective. We provide a quantitative comparison between the "new" surgery and radiotherapy, based on articles that report on ambulatory status before and after treatment, age, sex, primary neoplasm pathology, and spinal disease distribution. Ambulation was categorized as "success" or "rescue" (proportion of patients ambulatory after treatment and proportion regaining ambulatory function, respectively). Secondary outcomes were also analyzed. We calculated cumulative success and rescue rates for our ambulatory measurements and quantified heterogeneity using a mixed-effects model. We investigated the source of the heterogeneity in both a uni-variate and multivariate manner with a meta-regression model. Our analysis included data from 24 surgical articles (999 patients) and 4 radiation articles (543 patients), mostly uncontrolled cohort studies (Class Ⅲ). Surgical patients were 1.3 times more likely to be ambulatory after treatment and twice as likely to regain ambulatory function. Overall ambulatory success rates for surgery and radiation were 85% and 64%, respectively. Primary pathology was the principal factor determining survival. We present the first known formal meta-analysis using data from nonrandomized clinical studies. Although we attempted to control for imbalances between the surgical and radiation groups, significant heterogeneity undoubtedly still exists. Nonetheless, we believe the differences in the outcomes indicate a true difference resulting from treatment. We conclude that surgery should usually be the primary treatment with radiation given as adjuvant therapy. Neurologic status, overall health, extent of disease (spinal and extraspinal), and primary pathology all impact proper treatment selection.
机译:放射疗法已成为治疗转移性脊柱疾病的主要疗法。然而,手术已证明行之有效的方法是在圆周上对脊髓减压,然后进行重建和立即稳定。我们根据报道治疗前后的非卧床状态,年龄,性别,原发性肿瘤病理和脊柱疾病分布情况的文章,对“新”手术和放疗进行定量比较。步行活动被分类为“成功”或“抢救”(分别是治疗后可行走的患者比例和重新获得行走功能的比例)。次要结果也进行了分析。我们使用混合效应模型计算了动态测量的累积成功率和救援率,并量化了异质性。我们使用元回归模型以单变量和多变量方式调查了异质性的来源。我们的分析包括来自24篇外科文章(999例患者)和4篇放射文章(543例患者)的数据,其中大部分为非对照队列研究(Ⅲ类)。手术后患者非卧床活动的可能性高1.3倍,恢复非卧床功能的可能性高两倍。手术和放疗的总体门诊成功率分别为85%和64%。原发性病理是决定生存率的主要因素。我们使用来自非随机临床研究的数据,提出了第一个已知的正式荟萃分析。尽管我们试图控制外科手术组与放射治疗组之间的不平衡,但无疑仍然存在明显的异质性。尽管如此,我们认为结果的差异表明治疗带来的真正差异。我们得出的结论是,手术通常应作为放射治疗的辅助治疗。神经系统状况,整体健康状况,疾病范围(脊柱和脊柱外)和主要病理都会影响正确的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号