首页> 外文期刊>Network world >Service-level agreements are no longer enough
【24h】

Service-level agreements are no longer enough

机译:服务水平协议已不再足够

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Longtime readers know I'm a fanatic about service-level agreements. I regularly advise clients about SLA best practices, negotiation and enforcement strategies. And we talk often about how to develop service-level management and monitoring infrastructure that ensures that carriers live up to their promises. But all that's old school in a world where service providers are essentially just bandwidth providers. What happens as providers move from bandwidth providers to application providers? That is, when the service provider isn't just generating bits on a wire, but is delivering applications, storage and computing services from the cloud? A couple of things change in this new scenario. First, SLAs necessarily evolve from simple infrastructure metrics (latency, jitter, packet loss) to application-level metrics (application availability, response time).Second, monitoring and measurement needs to be far more comprehensive. Let's say you're relying on a hosting provider to deliver a key application.You should be able to track server availability, application performance, storage availability and network performance - not just router uptime. And if the application is hosted on a vir-tualized server, this can be mighty complex.
机译:长期的读者知道我对服务水平协议非常狂热。我定期为客户提供有关SLA最佳做法,谈判和执行策略的建议。我们经常谈论如何开发服务级别的管理和监视基础结构,以确保运营商兑现其承诺。但是,在服务提供商本质上仅仅是带宽提供商的世界中,这一切都是老派。当提供商从带宽提供商转移到应用程序提供商时会发生什么?就是说,当服务提供商不仅在网上生成比特,还从云中交付应用程序,存储和计算服务时?在这种新情况下,几件事发生了变化。首先,SLA必须从简单的基础结构指标(延迟,抖动,数据包丢失)发展到应用程序级指标(应用程序可用性,响应时间),其次,监控和测量需要更加全面。假设您依靠托管服务提供商来交付关键应用程序,那么您应该能够跟踪服务器可用性,应用程序性能,存储可用性和网络性能-而不仅仅是路由器正常运行时间。而且,如果应用程序托管在虚拟服务器上,则可能会非常复杂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号