首页> 外文期刊>Neophilologus >Under the Hood of Tess: Conflicting Reproductive Strategies in Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the D’Urbervilles
【24h】

Under the Hood of Tess: Conflicting Reproductive Strategies in Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the D’Urbervilles

机译:苔丝的掩饰:托马斯·哈迪《德伯家的苔丝》中的生殖策略冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Thomas Hardy’s Tess of the D’Urbervilles is analyzed from an evocritical perspective in order to consider evolved human reproductive strategies through the psychology and behavior of the novel’s three principal characters: Tess, Alec and Angel. It is argued that Hardy made the episode of Tess’ and Alec’s sexual contact, as well its interpretation by the characters, ambiguous, thereby suggesting the possibility of seduction rather than rape. In this context, two female mating patterns—inherited from our hominid ancestors—appear in Tess’ behavior: (a) the collection of high quality genes from a genetically fit male (Alec) who is not likely to stay with the female and provide for the offspring and (b) mating with a provider male who is interested in long-term parental investment (Angel). Conversely, Angel and Alec represent two male mating strategies that evolved as possible courses of action in our species: the dad and the cad respectively. The unwillingness of Angel to forgive Tess her sexual past is considered in the context of another evolved feature of the human mind: paternal uncertainty (the fear of the male’s genetic extinction through the possibility of raising another male’s offspring). This is juxtaposed with studies of male jealousy in different cultures and periods. Tess’ decision to tell Angel about her past is viewed in connection with the concept of modularity: an approach to human psychology based on the assumption that the mind is divided into specialized modules (responsible for different cognitive spheres) which can sometimes conflict.
机译:从进化论角度分析了托马斯·哈迪的《苔丝》,从小说的三个主要角色:苔丝,亚历克和安吉尔的心理和行为出发,考虑进化的人类生殖策略。有争议的是,哈代使苔丝和亚历克的性接触情节以及人物对情节的解释含糊不清,从而暗示了诱惑而不是强奸的可能性。在这种情况下,苔丝的行为表现出了两种女性交配模式(继承自我们原始的祖先):(a)从遗传上合适的雄性(Alec)收集高质量的基因,这些基因不太可能与雌性呆在一起并提供后代;以及(b)与对长期父母投资有兴趣的提供者男性(Angel)交配。相反,Angel和Alec代表了两种雄性交配策略,它们分别作为我们物种中可能的行动方式进化了:分别是爸爸和cad。天使不愿原谅Tess的性过去是在人类思维的另一个进化特征的背景下进行的:父系不确定性(通过繁殖另一只男性的后代而担心男性的遗传灭绝)。这与不同文化和时期男性嫉妒的研究并列。苔丝决定向安吉尔(Angel)讲述她的过去的决定是与模块化概念联系在一起的:模块化心理学是一种人类心理学的方法,该假设基于将思维分为有时可能会发生冲突的专门模块(负责不同的认知领域)的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号