...
首页> 外文期刊>Naval Research Logistics >Revenue Sharing Contracts in a Supply Chain with Uncontractible Actions
【24h】

Revenue Sharing Contracts in a Supply Chain with Uncontractible Actions

机译:具有不可契约行为的供应链中的收益共享合同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider a supplier-customer relationship where the customer faces a typical Newsvendor problem of determining perishable capacity to meet uncertain demand. The customer outsources a critical, demand-enhancing service to an outside supplier, who receives a fixed share of the revenue from the customer. Given such a linear sharing contract, the customer chooses capacity and the service supplier chooses service effort level before demand is realized. We consider the two cases when these decisions are made simultaneously (simultaneous game) or sequentially (sequential game). For each game, we analyze how the equilibrium solutions vary with the parameters of the problem. We show that in the equilibrium, it is possible that either the customer's capacity increases or the service supplier's effort level decreases when the supplier receives a larger share of the revenue. We also show that given the same sharing contract, the sequential game always induces a higher capacity and more effort. For the case of additive effort effect and uniform demand distribution, we consider the customer's problem of designing the optimal contract with or without a fixed payment in the contract, and obtain sensitivity results on how the optimal contract depends on the problem parameters. For the case of fixed payment, it is optimal to allocate more revenue to the supplier to induce more service effort when the profit margin is higher, the cost of effort is lower, effort is more effective in stimulating demand, the variability of demand is smaller or the supplier makes the first move in the sequential game. For the case of no fixed payment, however, it is optimal to allocate more revenue to the supplier when the variability of demand is larger or its mean is smaller. Numerical examples are analyzed to validate the sensitivity results for the case of normal demand distribution and to provide more managerial insights.
机译:我们考虑供应商与客户之间的关系,其中客户面临一个典型的新闻供应商问题,即确定易腐烂的能力以满足不确定的需求。客户将关键的,增强需求的服务外包给外部供应商,后者从客户那里获得固定份额的收入。在这种线性共享合同的情况下,客户选择容量,而服务提供商选择在实现需求之前的服务工作水平。我们考虑两种情况同时(同时博弈)或顺序(顺序博弈)做出。对于每个游戏,我们分析均衡解如何随问题的参数而变化。我们表明,在均衡状态下,当供应商获得更大份额的收入时,客户的能力可能会增加,服务提供商的工作量可能会减少。我们还表明,给定相同的共享合同,顺序博弈总是会带来更高的容量和更多的努力。对于累加效应和需求均匀分配的情况,我们考虑了客户设计合同时是否有固定付款的最优合同问题,并获得了关于最优合同如何取决于问题参数的敏感性结果。对于固定付款,最好是在利润率较高,工作成本较低,刺激需求更有效,需求变化较小的情况下,将更多收入分配给供应商以诱导更多服务工作或供应商在顺序游戏中采取第一步。但是,对于没有固定付款的情况,当需求的可变性较大或平均值较小时,最好将更多收入分配给供应商。分析了数值示例,以验证正常需求分配情况下的敏感性结果,并提供更多的管理见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号