首页> 外文期刊>Omega >Supply chain coordination using revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts
【24h】

Supply chain coordination using revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts

机译:使用与收益相关的收益共享合同进行供应链协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A typical single period revenue sharing contract specifies a priori a fixed fraction for the supply chain revenue to be shared among the supply chain players. Over the years, supply chains, especially in the movie industry, have adopted multi-period revenue sharing contracts that specify one fraction for each contract period. These revenue sharing contracts are of revenue-independent type such that the revenue sharing fractions are independent of the quantum of revenue generated. Motivated by the recent events in Bollywood - one of the popular arms of the Indian movie industry - in this paper we develop and analyze a game theoretic model for revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts wherein the actual proportion in which the supply chain revenue is shared among the players depends on the quantum of revenue generated. Our aim is to understand why revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts are (or not) preferred over revenue-independent contracts. We also examine if supply chains can be coordinated over multiple periods using both types of revenue sharing contracts. We build a two-period model characterizing supply chains in the movie industry and highlight the implications of the multi-period contractual setting for the supply chain coordinating revenue sharing contracts. We show that supply chains can be perfectly coordinated using both types of revenue sharing contracts; however, there exist situations in which revenue-dependent contracts outperform revenue-independent contracts. Using revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts supply chains can be coordinated while providing positive surplus to the supply chain players that is otherwise not possible under certain situations in revenue-independent contracts. We also demonstrate how revenue-dependent contracts enhance supply chain coordination and highlight their significance when the drop in the revenue potential from one period to another is moderate.
机译:典型的单期收益共享合同事先为供应链收益指定了固定比例,供供应链参与者共享。多年来,供应链,特别是在电影行业中,已经采用了多期收益共享合同,每个合同期间指定一个份额。这些收益分成合同属于收益无关类型,因此收益分成比例与所产生收益的数量无关。受宝莱坞(印度电影业的热门分支之一)最近发生的事件的影响,本文中,我们开发并分析了与收益相关的收益共享合同的博弈论模型,其中供应链收益在供应商之间共享的实际比例参与者取决于产生的收入量。我们的目的是了解为什么(或不)优先选择与收入无关的合同而不是与收入无关的合同。我们还检查了是否可以使用两种类型的收益共享合同在多个时期内协调供应链。我们建立了一个描述电影行业供应链的两阶段模型,并强调了多阶段合同设置对供应链协调收益共享合同的影响。我们证明,使用两种类型的收益共享合同可以完美地协调供应链。但是,在某些情况下,与收入无关的合同要优于与收入无关的合同。使用与收益相关的收益共享合同,可以协调供应链,同时为供应链参与者提供正盈余,而这在某些情况下在与收益无关的合同中是不可能的。我们还演示了与收入相关的合同如何增强供应链协调,并突出了当收入潜力从一个时期到另一个时期适度下降时它们的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号