首页> 外文期刊>Natural Resources Journal >Grazing Rights and Public Lands in New Zealand and the Western United States: A Comparative Perspective
【24h】

Grazing Rights and Public Lands in New Zealand and the Western United States: A Comparative Perspective

机译:比较看新西兰和美国西部的放牧权和公共土地

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Private rights in public resources have a propensity to dominate resources for the private benefit, unless the property rights framework clearly demarcates and vigilantly enforces the private/public divide. This proposition is examined in the public lands of the western United States and New Zealand from the comparative perspective of private rights, as seen in the natural resource of pasturage, and of public rights, as seen in the natural resource of recreation. Grazing use rights in these two jurisdictions share more in common than a superficial examination may suggest. Yet, it is the potency of their relatively fewer differences that has fed the expansion of private rights at the expense of public rights in New Zealand's public lands.
机译:公共资源中的私人权利倾向于为私人利益支配资源,除非产权框架明确界定和警惕地加强了私人/公共鸿沟。从牧场自然资源中的私人权利和娱乐自然资源中的公共权利的比较角度,在美国西部和新西兰的公共土地上对这一主张进行了研究。在这两个地区中,吃草使用权的共同点比表面审查可能要多。然而,正是由于它们相对较少的差异,才使私人权利的扩张以牺牲新西兰公共土地上的公共权利为代价。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Natural Resources Journal》 |2009年第2期|403-432|共30页
  • 作者

    JOHN PAGE;

  • 作者单位

    Property Law at the School of Law, University of New England, New South Wales, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号