首页> 外文期刊>Mobile networks & applications >Terminological (di) Similarities between Information Management and Knowledge Management: a Term Co-Occurrence Analysis
【24h】

Terminological (di) Similarities between Information Management and Knowledge Management: a Term Co-Occurrence Analysis

机译:信息管理与知识管理之间的术语(DI)相似性:一项共同发生分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The terminological composition of information management (IM) and knowledge management (KM) is described in order to evidence how much do these areas overlap within the library and information sciences (LIS) space. A term co-occurrence analysis is conducted as from documents extracted from Web of Science, covering the period 1980-2015. To examine the terminological (di) similarity two approaches are applied: 'overlay visualization & apos; and 'topic detection & apos;. The percentage of terminological similarity oscillates between 24% and 38% according to the 'overlay visualization & apos; and 'topic detection & apos; techniques. At the core of the terminological intersection between IM and KM lies the study around processes, technologies and information systems. However, they are semantically two separate areas that tend to address similar dimensions -such as the managerial, educational and medical, but emphasizing different approach. Moreover, IM refers to the library and information organizations, highlighting the focus onpersonal information management,human information behavior,health information management, andinformation resource management. Oppositely, KM highlights the business, management and accounting realms in which topics likeknowledge sharing and social networks,knowledge management strategies, andknowledge management projectsare prevailing. These results would help to (re) define curricular contents of LIS programs as well as research and practical activities conducted by academicians and managers. This is the most comprehensive quantitative study in examining the epistemic borders between IM and KM in the LIS research. The authors consider that the methodological procedures here employed might be suitable to understand the boundaries between similar fields.
机译:描述信息管理(IM)和知识管理(KM)的术语组成,以证明这些领域在图书馆和信息科学(LIS)空间中重叠多少。术语共同发生分析是从科学网中提取的文件进行的,涵盖了1980-2015期间。为了检查术语(DI)相似性,应用了两种方法:'覆盖可视化'。和“主题检测”。根据“覆盖可视化”,术语相似性的百分比振荡在24%和38%之间;和“主题检测”。技巧。在IM和KM之间的术语交叉点的核心,围绕过程,技术和信息系统研究。然而,它们是三种单独的区域,倾向于解决类似的尺寸-Such作为管理,教育和医疗,而是强调不同的方法。此外,IM指的是图书馆和信息组织,突出了焦点纵向信息管理,人力信息,健康信息管理,和信息资源管理。相反,km强调了商业,管理和会计领域,其中主题是知识共享和社交网络,知识管理战略,知识管理项目的普遍存在。这些结果将有助于(重新)定义LIS计划的课程内容以及院士和经理进行的研究和实践活动。这是在LIS研究中检查IM和KM之间的认识到的最全面的定量研究。作者认为,这里采用的方法学程序可能适合理解类似领域之间的边界。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号