【24h】

The future of Trident

机译:三叉戟的未来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In an excellent report, entitled Continuity/change: rethinking options for Trident replacement, Dr Nick Ritchie (2010), a Research Fellow at the Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, discusses the potential for options between a like-for-like replacement and unilateral nuclear disarmament and concludes that:rnThe key to opening up some of these options is ending the current operational posture of 'continuous-at-sea deterrence' (CASD). Ending CASD will require rethinking the necessity of 100% assured retaliation and invulnerability to a 'bolt from the blue' strategic attack, a realistic assessment of the impact of a reduced readiness posture on 'crisis stability", and a reassessment of the level required to constitute a 'minimum deterrent". It will also require detailed analysis of the training and capability management structures necessary to operate the Trident system at various levels of reduced readiness over a long period of time and redeploy a nuclear capability within a specified period of time if required to so in a period of international tension. (Ritchie 2010).
机译:布拉德福德大学和平研究系研究员尼克·里奇(Nick Ritchie)博士(2010)在一份题为《连续性/变化:三叉戟替代方案的重新思考》的出色报告中,讨论了同类替代方案之间的选择潜力以及单方面的核裁军,并得出以下结论:开启其中一些选择的关键是结束当前“海上连续威慑”(CASD)的作战态势。结束CASD将需要重新考虑100%确保报复的必要性和对“蓝色突击”战略攻击的无敌性的必要性,对减少准备状态对“危机稳定”的影响进行现实评估,并重新评估构成“最低威慑力”。它还需要对培训和能力管理结构进行详细的分析,以使三叉戟系统长时间处于不同程度的降低准备状态,并在规定的时间内重新部署核能力(如果需要)。国际紧张局势。 (Ritchie 2010)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号