首页> 外文期刊>Mechanical systems and signal processing >Acoustic emission source location from P-wave arrival time corrected data and virtual field optimization method
【24h】

Acoustic emission source location from P-wave arrival time corrected data and virtual field optimization method

机译:来自P波到达时间纠正数据和虚拟字段优化方法的声发射源位置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acoustic emission (AE) event location plays an important role in structural safety assessments. However, accurately locating an AE event is usually difficult, especially for a small structure. Interestingly, a pencil-lead break (PLB) experiment shows that the P-wave arrival time of a sensor is always significantly different (~260 μs) from that of the other sensors. This time difference is much greater than the P-wave travel time in the range of the experimental sample. Therefore, it can be inferred that there is a P-wave arrival time system error (PATSE) for each sensor. The PATSE may be due to a combined result of the sensor site effect and signal transfer delay time from the sensor to the signal storage. To handle this, a Bayesian inversion framework was built to estimate PATSEs. A synthetic test demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed Bayesian method for noisy P-wave arrival time data. Then, Bayesian inversion was applied to 15 PLB events, which confirmed the existence of PATSE in an AE experiment for the first time. The average PATSE reached 1.47 μs without considering the P-wave arrival time significantly different sensor. The average location error of 25 PLB events was 14.30 mm and 6.58 mm for PATSE unremoved and removed data, respectively. To achieve this, a high-precision virtual field optimization location method (VFOM) was used. This demonstrates the necessity of removing the PATSEs. Finally, the AE event location performance for the PATSE unremoved and removed data was compared, where the AE events were obtained from the uniaxlal compression of a red sandstone sample. The results indicated that there was a higher location detection success rate for the corrected data. The AE locations based on the corrected data were in a better correlation with the rock sample failure mode than that without correction. Moreover, increase the signal sampling frequency for AE event identification, use a real-time inverted 3D velocity model and update the PATSEs in real time could be used to further improve the AE event location accuracy.
机译:声学发射(AE)事件位置在结构安全评估中起着重要作用。然而,准确地定位AE事件通常很困难,特别是对于小结构。有趣的是,铅笔铅断裂(PLB)实验表明,传感器的P波到达时间与其他传感器的P波到达时间始终显着不同(〜260μs)。该时差远大于实验样品范围内的P波行驶时间。因此,可以推断出每个传感器存在P波到达时间系统错误(Patse)。 Patse可能是由于传感器站点效应的组合结果和从传感器到信号存储的信号传输延迟时间。为了处理这一点,建立了贝叶斯反演框架以估计拍坡。合成试验证明了嘈杂的P波到达时间数据的提出的贝叶斯方法的有效性。然后,贝叶斯反演应用于15个PLB事件,这证实了第一次确认在AE实验中的存在清晰。平均Patse达到1.47μs,而不考虑P波到达时间明显不同的传感器。分别的平均定位误差为25个PLB事件为14.30 mm,6.58 mm,分别进行清除和移除数据。为此,使用高精度虚拟字段优化位置方法(VFOM)。这证明了消除凹痕的必要性。最后,比较了Patse未经死亡和移除数据的AE事件位置性能,其中AE事件是从红砂岩样品的Uniaxlal压缩获得的。结果表明,校正数据存在更高的位置检测成功率。基于校正数据的AE位置与岩体样本失败模式更好地相关,而不是没有校正。此外,增加AE事件识别的信号采样频率,使用实时反转的3D速度模型,并实时更新凹图,以便进一步提高AE事件定位精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号