...
首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering >Comparing Sequential with Combined Spatiotemporal Clustering of Passenger Trips in the Public Transit Network Using Smart Card Data
【24h】

Comparing Sequential with Combined Spatiotemporal Clustering of Passenger Trips in the Public Transit Network Using Smart Card Data

机译:使用智能卡数据比较公共交通网络中旅客出行的顺序和时空组合聚类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Smart card datasets in the public transit network provide opportunities to analyse the behaviour of passengers as individuals or as groups. Studying passenger behaviour in both spatial and temporal space is important because it helps to find the pattern of mobility in the network. Also, clustering passengers based on their trips regarding both spatial and temporal similarity measures can improve group-based transit services such as Demand-Responsive Transit (DRT). Clustering passengers based on their trips can be carried out by different methods, which are investigated in this paper. This paper sheds light on differences between sequential and combined spatial and temporal clustering alternatives in the public transit network. Firstly, the spatial and temporal similarity measures between passengers are defined. Secondly, the passengers are clustered using a hierarchical agglomerative algorithm by three different methods including sequential two-step spatial-temporal (S-T), sequential two-step temporal-spatial (T-S), and combined one-step spatiotemporal (ST) clustering. Thirdly, the characteristics of the resultant clusters are described and compared using maps, numerical and statistical values, cross correlation techniques, and temporal density plots. Furthermore, some passengers are selected to show how differently the three methods put the passengers in groups. Four days of smart card data comprising 80,000 passengers in Brisbane, Australia, are selected to compare these methods. The analyses show that while the sequential methods (S-T and T-S) discover more diverse spatial and temporal patterns in the network, the ST method entails more robust groups (higher spatial and temporal similarity values inside the groups).
机译:公共交通网络中的智能卡数据集为分析作为个人或群体的乘客的行为提供了机会。研究乘客在时空上的行为非常重要,因为它有助于找到网络中的移动性模式。此外,基于有关空间和时间相似性度量的旅行对乘客进行聚类可以改善基于组的过境服务,例如需求响应过境(DRT)。可以根据旅行方式对乘客进行聚类,可以通过不同的方法进行,本文对此进行了研究。本文阐明了公共交通网络中顺序和组合的空间和时间集群替代方案之间的差异。首先,定义了乘客之间的时空相似性度量。其次,通过三种不同的方法,使用分级凝聚算法对乘客进行聚类,包括顺序两步时空(S-T),顺序两步时空(T-S)和组合一步时空(ST)聚类。第三,使用图,数值和统计值,互相关技术和时间密度图来描述和比较所得聚类的特征。此外,选择了一些乘客以显示这三种方法如何将乘客分组。选择了四天的智能卡数据,其中包括澳大利亚布里斯班的80,000名乘客,以比较这些方法。分析表明,尽管顺序方法(S-T和T-S)发现网络中更多的时空模式,但ST方法需要更健壮的组(组内更高的时空相似度值)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mathematical Problems in Engineering 》 |2019年第9期| 5070794.1-5070794.16| 共16页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Queensland Sch Civil Engn Brisbane Qld Australia;

    Univ Queensland Sch Civil Engn Brisbane Qld Australia|Amirkabir Univ Technol Dept Civil & Environm Engn Tehran Iran;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号