首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering >Fresh-Keeping Effort and Channel Performance in a Fresh Product Supply Chain with Loss-Averse Consumers' Returns
【24h】

Fresh-Keeping Effort and Channel Performance in a Fresh Product Supply Chain with Loss-Averse Consumers' Returns

机译:避免厌恶消费者退货的新鲜产品供应链中的新鲜努力和渠道绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider a fresh product supply chain consisting of one fresh product supplier and one e-tailer. Supplier sells fresh products through e-tailer in an online market, and the e-tailer offers a full-refund return policy to loss-averse consumers and exerts a fresh-keeping effort to keep the product at the optimum freshness level. By developing an analytical model, we derive the optimal price, quantity, and fresh-keeping effort jointly and verify that it is unique in the centralized setting. Based on the comparison, we demonstrate that the e-tailer's profit is greater with fresh-keeping effort than without it; therefore, the e-tailer has an incentive to engage in fresh-keeping effort. We also show that the return rate is independent of the fresh-keeping effort and consumers' loss aversion. In the decentralized setting, we first characterize the optimal wholesale price by the numerical study and then find that although the buyback contract still works, the revenue-sharing contract fails to achieve channel coordination under our model formulation. Furthermore, we develop a revenue-and cost-sharing contract that can coordinate the supply chain by designing a new contractual mechanism. Our numerical studies offer the Pareto improvement regions under the buyback and revenue-and cost-sharing contracts in which the supplier and e-tailer can earn more expected profits compared with being under wholesale price contract.
机译:我们考虑一个由一个新鲜产品供应商和一个电子零售商组成的新鲜产品供应链。供应商通过在线市场上的电子零售商出售新鲜产品,并且电子零售商向厌恶损失的消费者提供全额退款政策,并竭尽全力使产品保持最佳的新鲜度。通过开发分析模型,我们可以共同得出最优的价格,数量和保鲜效果,并验证它在集中式设置中是否唯一。通过比较,我们证明,通过保鲜努力,电子零售商的利润要比没有零售商更大。因此,电子零售商有动机进行保鲜工作。我们还表明,回报率与保鲜努力和消费者的损失厌恶程度无关。在分散的环境中,我们首先通过数值研究来表征最优批发价格,然后发现尽管回购合同仍然有效,但是在我们的模型公式下,收益共享合同无法实现渠道协调。此外,我们开发了收入和成本共享合同,可以通过设计新的合同机制来协调供应链。我们的数值研究提供了根据回购和收入及成本分摊合同提供的帕累托改进区域,与批发价格合同相比,供应商和电子零售商可以赚取更多预期利润。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mathematical Problems in Engineering》 |2018年第8期|4717094.1-4717094.20|共20页
  • 作者

    Gu Bojun; Fu Yufang; Li Yarling;

  • 作者单位

    Zhejiang Ocean Univ, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, Zhoushan, Peoples R China;

    Zhejiang Ocean Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Zhoushan, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号