首页> 外文期刊>Philosophia Mathematica >The Problem is not Mathematics, but Mathematicians: Plato and the Mathematicians Again†
【24h】

The Problem is not Mathematics, but Mathematicians: Plato and the Mathematicians Again†

机译:问题不是数学,而是数学家:柏拉图和数学家再次†

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I argue against a formidable interpretation of Plato’s Divided Line image according to which dianoetic correctly applies the same method as dialectic. The difference between the dianoetic and dialectic sections of the Line is not methodological, but ontological. I maintain that while this interpretation correctly identifies the mathematical method with dialectic, (i.e., the method of philosophy), it incorrectly identifies the mathematical method with dianoetic. Rather, Plato takes dianoetic to be a misapplication of the mathematical method by a subset of practicing mathematicians. Thus, Plato’s critique of dianoetic is a not a critique of mathematics, as such, but of mathematicians.
机译:我反对对柏拉图的“分界线”图像进行强大的解释,根据该解释,方言学正确地运用了与辩证法相同的方法。直线的辩证法和辩证法之间的区别不是方法论上的,而是本体论上的。我坚持认为,虽然这种解释正确地用辩证法来识别数学方法(即哲学方法),但它错误地用辩证法来识别数学方法。而是,柏拉图将方言学认为是数学实践方法的误用,而这是一部分实践数学家所为。因此,柏拉图对魔术的批判并不是对数学的批判,而是对数学家的批判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号