首页> 外文期刊>Marine pollution bulletin >Level of Detail in Ecological Risk Assessments
【24h】

Level of Detail in Ecological Risk Assessments

机译:生态风险评估的详细程度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ecological risk assessment (ERA) is an iterative process that can involve proceeding through several tiers of as- sessment prior to obtaining results with acceptable un- certainty. Thc first tier (e.g., screening-level risk assessment (SLRA)) is typically conservative and serves to narrow the scope of the assessment to the main issues of concern. The strategy for subsequent assessment tiers (e.g., detailed level risk assessment (DLRA)) is dependent on a number of factors and is difficult to prejudge. Con- sequently, while formal prescriptive guidance may be useful for the SLRA, it would probably be constraining for DLRA and reduce the effectiveness of the risk assessment process. This paper examines the level of detail required for SLRA and DLRA. Differences between the two in- clude: type of information; levels of resources, conserva- tism and uncertainty; information used; range of substances of potential concern (SOPCs) and receptors considered; use of multiple lines of evidence; level of ef fects estimation; point versus probabilistic estimates of exposure and effects. The appropriate level of detail for both types of risk assessment is described, but not pre- scrihed.
机译:生态风险评估(ERA)是一个反复的过程,可能涉及在获得具有不确定性的结果之前,要进行几层评估。第一层(例如,筛查级风险评估(SLRA))通常较为保守,可将评估范围缩小到所关注的主要问题。后续评估层级的策略(例如,详细级别风险评估(DLRA))取决于许多因素,并且难以预先判断。因此,尽管正式的规范性指南对SLRA可能有用,但它可能会限制DLRA并降低风险评估流程的有效性。本文研究了SLRA和DLRA所需的详细程度。两者之间的差异包括:信息类型;资源水平,保守性和不确定性;使用的信息;考虑的潜在关注物质(SOPC)和受体范围;使用多条证据;效果评估水平;点与概率估计的接触和影响。描述了两种风险评估的适当详细程度,但没有规定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号