...
首页> 外文期刊>Marine policy >Participative multi-criteria decision analysis in marine management and conservation: Research progress and the challenge of integrating value judgments and uncertainty
【24h】

Participative multi-criteria decision analysis in marine management and conservation: Research progress and the challenge of integrating value judgments and uncertainty

机译:海洋管理和保护中的参与式多准则决策分析:研究进展以及整合价值判断和不确定性的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Managers and practitioners have increasingly applied participative multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in marine multi-objective management situations. Despite methodological advances and practical experiences, there is no systematic review that clarifies the current scope and challenges of participatory MCDA in fisheries management, aquaculture and marine conservation. Using the IS! Web of Science database, 95 peer-reviewed publications were found that report MCDA applications in marine management (fisheries or aquaculture) and marine conservation. Of these, 31 studies explicitly and systematically incorporate stakeholders' engagement at one or more stages of the MCDA process. Results show how participative MCDA has been applied in a wide range of marine multi-objective problems. Interestingly, 76% of studies included participation and 24% consultation processes. Most MCDA studies in marine environments were developed in Europe and Asia. Results highlight that despite successful experiences in participative MCDA, participation has been generally fragmented. Participatory processes have focused mainly at particular stages, such as the establishment of objectives and criteria, and elicitation of weights of importance. Conversely, other important stages of MCDA, such as identifying alternatives, estimating consequences or prioritizing management alternatives, exhibited low levels of participation and/or consultation. In addition, results suggest that uncertainties around multiple values judgments are seldom treated in marine MCDA studies. Greater rigor in promoting an active participation in the complete decision process and fully considering the uncertainties around people's value judgments are important research gaps, which if addressed, could substantially improve participative MCDA applications aimed at achieving sustainable management and conservation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:管理人员和从业人员越来越多地将参与式多标准决策分析(MCDA)应用于海洋多目标管理环境中。尽管在方法上取得了进步,并取得了实践经验,但尚无系统的评估来阐明参与式MCDA在渔业管理,水产养殖和海洋保护方面的当前范围和挑战。使用IS!在Web of Science数据库中,发现了95篇经过同行评审的出版物,这些出版物报告了MCDA在海洋管理(渔业或水产养殖)和海洋保护中的应用。在这些研究中,有31项研究明确且系统地将利益相关者的参与纳入MCDA流程的一个或多个阶段。结果表明,参与式MCDA如何应用于广泛的海洋多目标问题。有趣的是,76%的研究包括参与和24%的咨询过程。大多数海洋环境中的MCDA研究是在欧洲和亚洲进行的。结果表明,尽管在参与式MCDA方面取得了成功的经验,但参与程度总体上是分散的。参与过程主要集中在特定阶段,例如目标和标准的确定以及重要性的确定。相反,MCDA的其他重要阶段,例如确定替代方案,评估结果或优先考虑管理替代方案,则参与和/或咨询的水平较低。此外,结果表明,在海洋MCDA研究中很少处理围绕多值判断的不确定性。重要的研究空白是加强积极参与整个决策过程的积极性,并充分考虑人们的价值判断的不确定性,这是重要的研究空白,如果能够解决,则可以大大改善旨在实现可持续管理和保护的参与性MCDA应用程序。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号