首页> 外文期刊>Marine ecology progress series >Acoustic deterrent devices to prevent pinniped depredation: efficiency, conservation concerns and possible solutions
【24h】

Acoustic deterrent devices to prevent pinniped depredation: efficiency, conservation concerns and possible solutions

机译:防止针尖刮伤的声学威慑装置:效率,保护问题和可能的解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) to prevent pinniped predation on fish farms and fisheries are widely used, but show highly varying success. Recently, ADDs have also been highlighted as a conservation concern due to their adverse impact on toothed whales. We review the available literature on the efficiency of commercial ADDs, evaluate the unintended impact on behaviour, communication and hearing of marine life, and suggest solutions based on psycho-physiological predictions. The main problems associated with ADDs are a lack of long-term efficiency, introduction of substantial noise pollution to the marine environment and long-term effects on target and non-target species. Odontocetes have more sensitive hearing than pinnipeds at the frequencies where most ADDs operate, which may explain the reported large-scale habitat exclusion of odontocetes when ADDs are used. Furthermore, long-term exposure to ADDs may damage the hearing of marine mammals. Fish and invertebrates have less sensitive hearing than marine mammals and fewer efforts have been made to quantify the effects of noise on these taxa. Solutions can be found by decreasing sound exposure, exploiting neuronal reflex arcs associated with flight behaviour and making use of differences in species' hearing abilities to increase target specificity. To minimise adverse effects, environmental impact assessments should be carried out before deploying ADDs and only effective and target-specific devices should be used.
机译:防止鱼类养殖场和渔业中的尖刺捕食的声学威慑装置(ADD)广泛使用,但取得了巨大的成功。最近,由于ADDs对齿鲸的不利影响,也被作为一种保护问题而受到重视。我们回顾了有关商业ADD效率的现有文献,评估了对海洋生物的行为,交流和听觉的意外影响,并提出了基于心理生理预测的解决方案。与ADDs相关的主要问题是缺乏长期效率,对海洋环境造成严重的噪声污染以及对目标和非目标物种的长期影响。在大多数ADD的工作频率下,齿形突齿动物的听力比钳夹齿更敏感,这可能解释了使用ADDs时报道的齿形突齿动物的大规模生境排除。此外,长期接触ADD可能会损害海洋哺乳动物的听力。与海洋哺乳动物相比,鱼类和无脊椎动物的听觉灵敏度较低,并且为量化噪声对这些类群的影响所做的努力也较少。可以通过减少声音的暴露,利用与飞行行为相关的神经元反射弧并利用物种的听觉能力差异来提高目标特异性来找到解决方案。为了最大程度地减少不利影响,应在部署ADD之前进行环境影响评估,并且仅应使用有效且针对特定目标的设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号