首页> 外文期刊>Manufacturing and service operations management >Is Servicization a Win-Win Strategy? Profitability and Environmental Implications of Servicization
【24h】

Is Servicization a Win-Win Strategy? Profitability and Environmental Implications of Servicization

机译:服务化是双赢战略吗?服务的盈利能力和环境影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Problem definition: Servicization is a business strategy to sell the functionality of a product rather than the product itself. It has been touted as an environmentally friendly strategy as it encourages manufacturers to take more responsibility for their products. We study when servicization results in a win-win outcome where it can simultaneously increase a firm's profits and decrease its environmental impact compared with selling products. Academic/practical relevance: Whereas policy planners are interested in strategies that reduce environmental impact, firms are unlikely to embrace them if they are not profitable. Hence, understanding when servicization results in a win-win outcome is critical both for firms and for policy makers. Methodology: We construct a stylized game-theoretic model that takes into account several key dynamics not accounted for in prior literature. In particular, we allow the servicizing firm to tailor the service to consumers' needs, endogenize product durability choice, and also use an environmental impact metric that captures the low discretionary use nature of products. Results: For products that have a low use impact relative to their production and disposal impacts, servicization can be a win-win strategy only if the firm has sufficiently high operating efficiency. By contrast, for products that have a high use impact relative to their production and disposal impacts, servicization can be a win-win strategy only if the firm has sufficiently low operating efficiency and the consumer segments are adequately similar. Furthermore, servicization can improve consumer welfare and simultaneously improve profitability and environmental impact only for products with a low relative use impact. Managerial implications: Whether servicization leads to a win-win outcome cannot simply be determined by changes in product durability, as often argued. It critically depends on the firm's relative operating efficiency, environmental impact of product in its use phase relative to the production and disposal phases, and the similarity of consumer segments. Our results explicitly characterize these relations.
机译:问题定义:服务化是一种销售产品功能而不是产品本身的商业策略。它被吹捧为一种环保战略,因为它鼓励制造商对其产品承担更多责任。我们研究了服务化何时会带来双赢的结果,与服务产品相比,服务化可以同时增加公司的利润并减少对环境的影响。学术/实践上的相关性:尽管政策制定者对减少环境影响的战略很感兴趣,但如果企业无法盈利,则不太可能接受这些战略。因此,了解服务何时会带来双赢结果对于公司和决策者都至关重要。方法:我们构建了一个程式化的博弈论模型,该模型考虑了先前文献中未考虑的几个关键动态。尤其是,我们允许服务公司根据消费者的需求量身定制服务,内化产品的耐用性选择,并使用对环境的影响指标来反映产品的随意性低。结果:对于相对于生产和处置影响而言使用影响较小的产品,只有在公司具有足够高的运营效率的情况下,维修服务才是双赢的策略。相比之下,对于相对于其生产和处置影响而言具有较高使用影响的产品,只有当公司的运营效率足够低并且消费者群体足够相似时,服务化才能成为双赢策略。此外,仅对相对使用影响较小的产品,服务化可以改善消费者的福利,同时提高利润率和环境影响。对管理的影响:经常讨论,不能仅仅通过产品耐用性的变化来确定维修是否导致双赢。它主要取决于公司的相对运营效率,产品在其使用阶段相对于生产和处置阶段的环境影响以及消费者群体的相似性。我们的结果明确说明了这些关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号