首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental health >Environmental Health Priorities of Residents and Environmental Health Professionals: Implications for Improving Environmental Health Services in Rural Versus Urban Communities
【24h】

Environmental Health Priorities of Residents and Environmental Health Professionals: Implications for Improving Environmental Health Services in Rural Versus Urban Communities

机译:居民和环境卫生专业人士的环境健康优先事项:对农村环境卫生服务改善城市社区的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Previous research has suggested differences between public and professional understanding of the field of environmental health (EH) and the role of EH services within urban and rural communities. This study investigated EH priority differences between 1) rural and urban residents and 2) residents and EH professionals, and presents quantitative and qualitative methods for establishing locality-specific EH priorities. Residents (N = 588) and EH professionals (N = 63) in Alabama identified EH priorities via a phone or online survey. We categorized rurality of participant residences by rural urban commuting area codes and population density, and tested whether or not EH priorities were different between urban and rural residents. Built environment issues, particularly abandoned houses, and air pollution were high priorities for urban residents whereas, water and sanitation issues, and paper mill-related pollution were high priorities in rural communities. EH professionals ranked food safety and water and sanitation issues as higher priorities than residents did. Results highlight the importance of urbanicity on environmental risk perception and the utility of simple and inexpensive engagement methods for understanding these differences. Differences between residents and EH professionals suggest improving stakeholder participation in local-level EH decision making might lead to greater awareness of EH services, which might in turn improve support and effectiveness of those services.
机译:以前的研究表明,公众和专业了解环境卫生领域(EH)的差异以及EH服务在城乡社区中的作用。本研究调查了1)个农村和城市居民和2)居民和EH专业人员的EH优先差异,并提出了建立地方特定EH优先事项的定量和定性方法。 Alabama的居民(N = 588)和EH专业人士(N = 63)通过电话或在线调查确定了EH优先事项。我们通过农村城市通勤区代码和人口密度分类了参与者住宅的知识,并测试了城乡居民之间是否有不同的优先事项。建造环境问题,特别是被遗弃的房屋和空气污染是城市居民的高度优先事项,而水和卫生问题,以及造纸有关的污染是农村社区的高度优先事项。 EH专业人士将食品安全和水和卫生问题排名,优先于优先权比居民所做的更高。结果突显了城市性对环境风险感知的重要性以及对理解这些差异的简单和廉价的参与方法的效用。居民和EH专业人员之间的差异建议改善利益攸关方参与地方级别的欧盟局域会决策可能会提高欧盟服务的认识,这可能又可以提高这些服务的支持和有效性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of environmental health》 |2017年第5期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Virginia Tech Virginia Maryland Reg Coll Vet Med Dept Populat Hlth Sci Blacksburg VA 24061 USA;

    Univ Alabama Birmingham Sch Publ Hlth Ctr Study Community Hlth Birmingham AL USA;

    Univ Alabama Birmingham Sch Publ Hlth Survey Res Unit Birmingham AL USA;

    Virginia Tech Virginia Maryland Reg Coll Vet Med Dept Populat Hlth Sci Blacksburg VA 24061 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号